From the thread: "Fat" Gene Found by Scientists
You're on!
Last year I looked into this quickly. What I came away with was that having a lot of sugar in one's diet increased the likelihood that one would get sugar cravings and overeat.
Processed American foods are likely to have a lot of sugar in it. These are some of the alternate names for sugar:
http://www.wellnesstips.ca/sugar.htm
WHO recommends that people eat less than 10% of their total daily calorie intake in added "free" sugar.
( http://www.reducetriglycerides.com/diet_triglycerides_sugar.htm )
Because of the American labeling laws that is not easy to do in the USA. The amount of sugar the food has is listed in grams, but it's not possible to tell how much was added by the food manufacturer and how much was already a part of the food. What I do is look for foods with less than 3 different forms of sugar and have them listed in the back rather than the head of the ingredient listing. (Order of the ingredient listing is determined by the amount of the ingredient used.)
Effects of sugar:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2006/06/14/4324
( I added the bolding.)
IIRC, corn syrup is fructose. And of course HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) would be fructose!
Last year I also read the book, "Lick the Sugar Habit" by Nancy Appleton. I am uncertain that she is a credible source because I don't have a strong background in the sciences. However, on the off chance that she was correct, I decided to try to find a source of sugar with trace elements that were not processed out -- the theory being that the body would be able to metabolize the sugars better without any undesired side effects.
So even though it's pricey, I use Rapadura. I don't like the taste as much as white sugar, but as far as I can tell it seems to give me less of a sugar rush. Of course since it looks and taste different, it would be impossible for me to set up an informal double blind test even with the help of a friend.
El Greco said:This is an area I'll be happy to discuss anything about. Starting with the difference between cravings and appetite, perhaps?
Ivor said:This is quite interesting. Leptin is part of a negative feedback system (a.k.a homeostasis). I.e. whatever weight you are your body tries to maintain it. I've got more details about appetite and feeding behaviour in a neuroscience book.
El Greco said:Thanks Ivor, that's a very interesting area indeed. If you are interested in discussing leptin, ghrelin, NPY etc and their roles in appetite and cravings regulation, start a new thread and I'll chime in.
You're on!
Last year I looked into this quickly. What I came away with was that having a lot of sugar in one's diet increased the likelihood that one would get sugar cravings and overeat.
Processed American foods are likely to have a lot of sugar in it. These are some of the alternate names for sugar:
http://www.wellnesstips.ca/sugar.htm
Anything that ends in "ose" is a form of sugar, such as glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, lactose, dextrose, galactose etc. Also watch for "monosaccharides" or "disaccharides", which are also fancy names for sugar.
WHO recommends that people eat less than 10% of their total daily calorie intake in added "free" sugar.
( http://www.reducetriglycerides.com/diet_triglycerides_sugar.htm )
Because of the American labeling laws that is not easy to do in the USA. The amount of sugar the food has is listed in grams, but it's not possible to tell how much was added by the food manufacturer and how much was already a part of the food. What I do is look for foods with less than 3 different forms of sugar and have them listed in the back rather than the head of the ingredient listing. (Order of the ingredient listing is determined by the amount of the ingredient used.)
Effects of sugar:
http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2006/06/14/4324
Fructose, on the other hand, is not metabolized in the same way. In fact, it is only broken down in the liver, and stimulates production of glycogen, a complex polysaccharide, and lipids, so most of the energy contained gets stored, rather than used. In addition, fructose does not cause a satiating response, and does not stimulate insulin production in the short term, and can cause insulin resistance following chronic exposure. Finally, fructose also increases production of LDL cholesterol, which is the bad kind that is a driving force in CVD.
( I added the bolding.)
IIRC, corn syrup is fructose. And of course HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) would be fructose!
Last year I also read the book, "Lick the Sugar Habit" by Nancy Appleton. I am uncertain that she is a credible source because I don't have a strong background in the sciences. However, on the off chance that she was correct, I decided to try to find a source of sugar with trace elements that were not processed out -- the theory being that the body would be able to metabolize the sugars better without any undesired side effects.
So even though it's pricey, I use Rapadura. I don't like the taste as much as white sugar, but as far as I can tell it seems to give me less of a sugar rush. Of course since it looks and taste different, it would be impossible for me to set up an informal double blind test even with the help of a friend.
Last edited: