Hardenbergh
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2004
- Messages
- 1,073
I found this website this morning when I was searching for information about deism. I heard "The Savage Nation" last night and I heard Michael Savage say that he believed that God is omnipresent but not omnipotent, that he didn't think that God was controlling everything because of all the suffering in the world. To me, that sounds a lot like deism from the description in this quote:
I also found an article by Andrew Wright titled Types of Theism, Varieties of Atheism:
Types of Theism, Varieties of Atheism
Deism and AmericaDeism, as we define it, is a belief in a loving creator, an ultimate, eternal being, who is omnipresent and omniscient and perfectly good, but not omnipotent. This definition, with important qualifications, has substantial basis in philosophical history, despite the all-too widespread impression that the deistic creator is indifferent to its creation. The popular analogy for the deistic god is a supernatural watchmaker who may for all we know be fascinated by its handiwork, but is definitely not emotionally involved.
That analogy, however, is a simplistic historical caricature. It has been truly said that history is written by the victors. This is clearly the case with deism, since the popular notion of what it means has been disseminated in a culture dominated by the Christian religion. Let us attempt to set the record straight here. Contrary to popular Christian propaganda, ultimate reality ("god" if you prefer) as conceived by deism is not impersonal at all, merely non-omnipotent, hence non-controlling, and thus not in a position to provide people with the miracles on demand for which they so often yearn.
I also found an article by Andrew Wright titled Types of Theism, Varieties of Atheism:
Types of Theism, Varieties of Atheism