theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
Generally speaking, in the US, how you accomplish your physical commute to your workplace or jobsite is not your employer's concern. You're not on the clock. They don't owe you mileage. It's expected and understood that you'll get to and from work using your own equipment and resources.
Meanwhile, there's a (growing?) trend of requiring employees to install certain work-related apps on their personal phones, rather than providing them with a work phone the company pays for.
Now, for my generation (X), and probably for a lot of millennials, this practice of making you use your personal phone for work-related purposes is somewhat... repugnant. We might grudgingly go along with with such a policy, but we don't like it. Our sense of justice insists that a personal phone is personal, and not work equipment you pay for and your employer benefits from.
But I wonder about the younger generations. I grew up in a world where a mobile phone was first a rarity, then a luxury. Now they're ubiquitous. Gens Z and Alpha have grown up in a world where having a phone is as commonplace to them as having a car was commonplace to me.
The US is often criticized for having a car-centric society. In this new era, where everyone is always online by default, and the world becomes more and more "phone-centric", is there a congruency between commuting by car and "commuting" by phone?
I should note that there have been great improvements in non-intrusively securing work apps on personal devices. Gone are the days when the employer had no choice but to brick your phone if it got compromised. My employer uses an app that creates a separate, firewalled VM on the phone, and uses it to launch CIS-approved versions of certain work-related apps. If a phone gets compromised, they just remotely wipe the VM, leaving the rest of your phone untouched.
Meanwhile, there's a (growing?) trend of requiring employees to install certain work-related apps on their personal phones, rather than providing them with a work phone the company pays for.
Now, for my generation (X), and probably for a lot of millennials, this practice of making you use your personal phone for work-related purposes is somewhat... repugnant. We might grudgingly go along with with such a policy, but we don't like it. Our sense of justice insists that a personal phone is personal, and not work equipment you pay for and your employer benefits from.
But I wonder about the younger generations. I grew up in a world where a mobile phone was first a rarity, then a luxury. Now they're ubiquitous. Gens Z and Alpha have grown up in a world where having a phone is as commonplace to them as having a car was commonplace to me.
The US is often criticized for having a car-centric society. In this new era, where everyone is always online by default, and the world becomes more and more "phone-centric", is there a congruency between commuting by car and "commuting" by phone?
I should note that there have been great improvements in non-intrusively securing work apps on personal devices. Gone are the days when the employer had no choice but to brick your phone if it got compromised. My employer uses an app that creates a separate, firewalled VM on the phone, and uses it to launch CIS-approved versions of certain work-related apps. If a phone gets compromised, they just remotely wipe the VM, leaving the rest of your phone untouched.