• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CIT Fraud Revealed

BCR

Master Poster
BCR
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
2,278
By now, most people on this forum are familiar with this image from a CIT video.

Edwardpointsouth.gif


It has appeared on forum after forum, time and time again, as a ‘recreation’ of Edward Paik’s observation of AAL77 on September 11, 2001 and we are led to believe that this is also where he was when he made it. This is a location outside of the A-One Auto facility on Columbia Pike, about 50 feet in front of the shop.

However, as revealed a few years ago during my interview with his brother Shinki Paik, Ed was INSIDE the shop when the plane flew by.

Shinki Interview

Now, a follow-up with Ed Paik on location shows that indeed Ed was INSIDE the shop when he saw the plane. He recreates his actual POV and direction of sighting in this image.

edpaik.JPEG


This demonstrates that CIT has been very deceptive and less than honest in regards to the information they have been promoting. That is why many of us have asked to see and/or hear the entire recorded eyewitness accounts recorded by CIT, NOT the edited and staged versions they have released in their productions.

Craig, it is time to release ALL of the recorded interview footage. It is time for a new investigation and a new movement, or should I say the CIT-Truth Now movement. This is a case of "eyewitness speaks, conspiracy revealed", but the conspirators are Crag and Aldo, and the conspiracy is to conceal the truth.
 
Last edited:
The idiot CIT cameraman stood in the wrong place and couldn't see that Paik was pointing over his should at a power pole right on the edge of the street, so I guess it hardly matters that they came outside. Stupid always floats to the surface.
 
leftysergeant said:
The idiot CIT cameraman stood in the wrong place and couldn't see that Paik was pointing over his should at a power pole right on the edge of the street, so I guess it hardly matters that they came outside.
Click to expand...

Actually it does. One is a case of stupidity, the other is a case of deception.
 
Seriously? CIT is less than 100% honest? Never! Monkee Boy and The Fatman are my heroes, they wouldn't lie about something like this!

What is the world coming to, when you can't trust paranoid loons on the internet?
 
Excellent work, as usual.

I have repeatedly stated that CIT should have published ALL their raw video years ago.

Their deception is now indisputable.
 
Now math skills would be good for CIT, they could take the POV of Paik and see 77 would be about 466 feet away. Using about 30 degrees and the fact the RADALT at the time is near 233 feet. OOPS, that matches RADAR and FDR data; CIT failed.

BCR shows steps professional aircraft accident investigators use; the next step may be Paik using a yard stick to line up his POV; take the angle and other observations; like the police watching 77 (or FDR, RADAR) fly down the road, then you nail a point where 77 passed in space. What does CIT use?

BCR ruins conspiracy; CIT is a conspiracy to sell lies to the gullible

WARNING another CT web site ... other people who support idiotic delusions on 911, other conspiracy theorists with undefined zero evidence scenarios of stupid on 911 find CIT is a special case of super-stupid-investigating. How do some CT use rational thought to discredit other CTers, but fail to apply the same skeptical critical thinking to themselves? Albeit I only scanned this web site of woo for a few seconds...
 
Last edited:
BCR said:
By now, most people on this forum are familiar with this image from a CIT video.

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/Edwardpointsouth.gif[/qimg]

It has appeared on forum after forum, time and time again, as a ‘recreation’ of Edward Paik’s observation of AAL77 on September 11, 2001 and we are led to believe that this is also where he was when he made it. This is a location outside of the A-One Auto facility on Columbia Pike, about 50 feet in front of the shop.

However, as revealed a few years ago during my interview with his brother Shinki Paik, Ed was INSIDE the shop when the plane flew by.

Shinki Interview

Now, a follow-up with Ed Paik on location shows that indeed Ed was INSIDE the shop when he saw the plane. He recreates his actual POV and direction of sighting in this image.

[qimg]http://zoesflight.com/files/edpaik.JPEG[/qimg]

This demonstrates that CIT has been very deceptive and less than honest in regards to the information they have been promoting. That is why many of us have asked to see and/or hear the entire recorded eyewitness accounts recorded by CIT, NOT the edited and staged versions they have released in their productions.

Craig, it is time to release ALL of the recorded interview footage. It is time for a new investigation and a new movement, or should I say the CIT-Truth Now movement. This is a case of "eyewitness speaks, conspiracy revealed", but the conspirators are Crag and Aldo, and the conspiracy is to conceal the truth.
Click to expand...


Your imagination and deceit know no limits.

1. When was this image taken?
2. Do you have an image of his face so we can see that this is really Edward and not Shinki?
2. Where is the audio or video footage of the interview proving what he is really saying?
3. Why would you provide audio from his brother Shinki who did not see the plane at all yet fail to record Edward when he is the actual witness?
4. You claimed that Shinki said Ed was inside when the plane flew by but the audio from your "interview" with him is so horrible that I can't understand it. Why don't you provide a transcript?

And here´s a recap on what you were saying on the other thread

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5481702&postcount=619

Paik describes the 'black' which would result from being in the plane's shadow, again a perfect match for the fdr path and altitude considering the sun's elevation and describes it south moving west to east.
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5470497&postcount=396

AWSmith said:
Originally Posted by A W Smith
Edward Paiks back was to the plane. He was facing into his shop.
Click to expand...
BCR said:
And his brother says that Edward ducked and covered his head as the plane flew over.
Click to expand...

So AWSmith says that he was ´facing his shop´ to which you replied ´AND...Edward ducked and covered his head as the plane flew over´

He was also in the ´shadow´ of the plane...outside or inside?

Caught again Farmer.

Now the cheerleaders chime in behind you without examining your ´evidence´...wow.
 
paik2.JPEG


Oh just wait Craig/Alpo, video and more details are on the way. We can only go by what your star witness says. He says he was inside the shop. But I'm sure you already knew that.
 
Last edited:
BCR said:
[qimg]http://bluecollarrepublican.ipower.com/zoe/files/paik2.JPEG[/qimg]

Oh just wait Craig/Alpo, video and more details are on the way. We can only go by what your star witness says. He says he was inside the shop. But I'm sure you already knew that.
Click to expand...

Is THAT pic meant to be the ´killer shot´?
Provide the transcript of your interview with his brother.
An audio/video of Paik actually ´admitting´ that he was ´inside the shop´.
Until then, you´re blowing hot air.

Until then THIS is his only recorded confirmation of what he saw.
 
mudlark said:
Is THAT pic meant to be the ´killer shot´?
Provide the transcript of your interview with his brother.
An audio/video of Paik actually ´admitting´ that he was ´inside the shop´.
Until then, you´re blowing hot air.

Until then THIS is his only recorded confirmation of what he saw.
Click to expand...


CIT video has Paik pointing across the street to the FDR and RADAR flight path; CIT narration says Paik supports the NoC path; they ignore their own interview evidence and make lies. Watch the video on the Internet and see Paik point south big time as CIT ignores and spins a delusion. Listen to what Paik says as he debunks CIT.
CIT videos have the same plot; witnesses debunk CIT delusions, as CIT narration ignores reality.

You have fallen for idiotic delusions and the worse investigators on earth bar none!

Go to his video cited above, at 4:04 Paik points to the real flight path he is trying to explain as CIT makes up moronic lies and proves they are idiots at investigation.

4:04 You just debunked yourself and CIT and you will not stop being a poster of lies and delusions; why?
 
Last edited:
BCR said:
By now, most people on this forum are familiar with this image from a CIT video.

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/Edwardpointsouth.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...
How much for the yellow MGB?
 
willhaven said:
How much for the yellow MGB?
Click to expand...
At 4:04 in the video presented by the CIT cheerleader, Paik points to the flight path and CIT missed it! The video is proof they are a fraud also.

CIT videos pretty much seal the deal that CIT are the worse investigators in the world, they are given real evidence and turn it into paranoid dirt dumb delusions.
 
Last edited:
mudlark said:
Is THAT pic meant to be the ´killer shot´?
Click to expand...

Oh no, that is just the tease. I did not take the picture and Shinki's audio is there for you to listen to already. Ed is just confirming what Shinki said, he was inside the shop.

So as soon as our man on the scene finishes his report and uploading his pictures and video, I'll link it. By the way, Paik is not the only eyewitness being re-interviewed. I know you guys are busy with the 'egg on your face', but I'm not going to rush this. It is just too much fun.
 
BCR said:
Oh no, that is just the tease. I did not take the picture and Shinki's audio is there for you to listen to already. Ed is just confirming what Shinki said, he was inside the shop.

So as soon as our man on the scene finishes his report and uploading his pictures and video, I'll link it. By the way, Paik is not the only eyewitness being re-interviewed. I know you guys are busy with the 'egg on your face', but I'm not going to rush this. It is just too much fun.
Click to expand...

The Shinki audio is undecipherable.
Nobody here would accept it if I presented it as evidence.
Damn nobody here has even accepted all the video evidence from the NOC witnesses OR their signed flightpaths.
Empty words, especially from you or ´wait and see´ innuendo don´t cut it.
Until you present a confirmed on camera interview with these witnesses, this thread is finished before it has even begun.

Later.
 
mudlark said:
Is THAT pic meant to be the ´killer shot´?
Provide the transcript of your interview with his brother.
An audio/video of Paik actually ´admitting´ that he was ´inside the shop´.
Until then, you´re blowing hot air.

Until then THIS is his only recorded confirmation of what he saw.
Click to expand...

I knew it! What a freaking Double standard!

Why don't you ask the same questions of the CIT mutts?

WHERE IS THEIR RAW VIDEO.

I know Shakey and Fat Aldo are reading this thread.
 
mudlark said:
The Shinki audio is undecipherable.
Nobody here would accept it if I presented it as evidence.
Damn nobody here has even accepted all the video evidence from the NOC witnesses OR their signed flightpaths.
Empty words, especially from you or ´wait and see´ innuendo don´t cut it.
Until you present a confirmed on camera interview with these witnesses, this thread is finished before it has even begun.

Later.
Click to expand...

You mean the videos where they all agree the plane hit the building yet CIT claims it flew over?. Yeah nice journalism.
 
mudlark said:
The Shinki audio is undecipherable.
Nobody here would accept it if I presented it as evidence.
Damn nobody here has even accepted all the video evidence from the NOC witnesses OR their signed flightpaths.
Empty words, especially from you or ´wait and see´ innuendo don´t cut it.
Until you present a confirmed on camera interview with these witnesses, this thread is finished before it has even begun.

Later.
Click to expand...

Denial is a wonderful thing :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom