andyandy
anthropomorphic ape
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 8,377
This is something that occurred to me a while back, i'd be interested in opinions....
When humans suffer a traumatic event there is generally an accepted coping mechanism cycle....
the Kübler-Ross Grief Cycle, lists the stages as below. Most are well understood, but for "bargaining" and "testing" i've added a brief description.
More details at http://changingminds.org/disciplines/change_management/kubler_ross/bargaining_stage.htm
1) Shock
2) Denial
3) Anger
4) Bargaining (seeking ways to avoid having the bad thing happen. Bargaining is thus a vain expression of hope that the bad news is reversible. Bargaining in illness includes seeking alternative therapies and experimental drugs.)
5) Depression
Testing (Even in the pit of depressive despair, reality eventually starts to bite and the person realizes that they cannot stay in that deep, dark hole forever. They thus start looking for realistic things that they can do. These may be taken on as 'experiments' to see if doing these things help the situation in any way)
6) Acceptance.
Now, it strikes me that Christianity (and other monotheistic religions) through their teachings, prolong both the denial and the bargaining stages of grief - and as such mean that people take longer to reach (6) acceptance. An added problem is that through offering false hope in stages (2) and (4), the depression would seem to be worsened (ie. you are left with the impression of being forsaken by your God, you turn the problem in on yourself, asking what you did wrong, etc. etc)
whereas, Buddhism takes you straight to (6) - at least theoretically, therefore minimizing time spent in phases (1) to (5).....
It seems (to me) to be fairly conclusive proof of the benefit of Buddhist teachings relative to other monotheistic approaches to grief - and something which is corroborated by scientific studies with regards to how humans cope with trauma....
any comments?
When humans suffer a traumatic event there is generally an accepted coping mechanism cycle....
the Kübler-Ross Grief Cycle, lists the stages as below. Most are well understood, but for "bargaining" and "testing" i've added a brief description.
More details at http://changingminds.org/disciplines/change_management/kubler_ross/bargaining_stage.htm
1) Shock
2) Denial
3) Anger
4) Bargaining (seeking ways to avoid having the bad thing happen. Bargaining is thus a vain expression of hope that the bad news is reversible. Bargaining in illness includes seeking alternative therapies and experimental drugs.)
5) Depression
Testing (Even in the pit of depressive despair, reality eventually starts to bite and the person realizes that they cannot stay in that deep, dark hole forever. They thus start looking for realistic things that they can do. These may be taken on as 'experiments' to see if doing these things help the situation in any way)
6) Acceptance.
Now, it strikes me that Christianity (and other monotheistic religions) through their teachings, prolong both the denial and the bargaining stages of grief - and as such mean that people take longer to reach (6) acceptance. An added problem is that through offering false hope in stages (2) and (4), the depression would seem to be worsened (ie. you are left with the impression of being forsaken by your God, you turn the problem in on yourself, asking what you did wrong, etc. etc)
whereas, Buddhism takes you straight to (6) - at least theoretically, therefore minimizing time spent in phases (1) to (5).....
It seems (to me) to be fairly conclusive proof of the benefit of Buddhist teachings relative to other monotheistic approaches to grief - and something which is corroborated by scientific studies with regards to how humans cope with trauma....
any comments?
Last edited: