He was a decent man. His opposition to the Iraq War and to the coalition with the Tories was admirable. Now his seat is lost and his party has been effectively obliterated. He deserved better than that, and he will be remembered for better than that, because the responsibility for that disaster was not his.The way it's being reported, the consensus is that he succumbed to the effects of his alcoholism. I cannot imagine the stress of being and MP and a party leader adding the pressure of combating alcoholism on top of that must have been excruciating.
Like so many LibDems, he seemed to be a decent sort of person who appeared to be intelligent, thoughtful and self-deprecating.
Seeing your post, I looked at BBC news - only 55 - too young.
Charles Kennedy was a lovely man, and a highly talented politician. These are the kind of words that always flow when public figures die, often because people feel they have to say those things, and rightly they are flowing thick and fast today as we mourn an important public figure, and a little bit of hypocrisy from political foes is allowed. But when I say that Charles was a lovely man and a talented politician, I mean it with all my heart.
...
He was great company, sober or drinking. He had a fine political mind and a real commitment to public service. He was not bitter about his ousting as leader and nor, though he disagreed often with what his party did in coalition with the Tories, did he ever wander down the rentaquote oppositionitis route. He was a man of real talent and real principle.
Despite the occasional blip when the drink interfered, he was a terrific communicator and a fine orator. He spoke fluent human, because he had humanity in every vein and every cell. Above all, he was a doting dad of his son, whose loss is going to be greater than for any of us, and who will be reminded of his father every time he looks in the mirror and sees his red hair and cheeky smile coming back. And he was a very good friend. I just wish that we, his friends, had been able to help him more, and that he was still with us today, adding a bit of light to an increasingly gloomy political landscape.
The way it's being reported, the consensus is that he succumbed to the effects of his alcoholism..........
I dunno. I get the feeling that they're all hinting that he committed suicide. One assumes that drink would have played a part in that if it turns out to be true.
'No suspicious circumstances' is generally a code for not suicide
Police are not treating his death as suspicious and a source told MailOnline he may have collapsed and died after a night of drinking but there is no evidence to suggest it was suicide.
Here's an Australian comment on the expression.'No suspicious circumstances' is generally a code for not suicide (and not murder/manslaughter either).
MANY lives have ended only to be marked in print with the sad and empty epitaph 'police said there were no suspicious circumstances'. That phrase, the journalistic euphemism for suicide, may fade away with the release today of the Australian Press Council's first comprehensive guidelines for reporting on the issue.
Former Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy died of a major haemorrhage linked to alcoholism, his family have said.
Mr Kennedy, who led the party between 1999 and 2006, died at his home in Fort William on Monday aged 55.
Following a post-mortem examination, his family issued a statement saying his unexpected death was "a consequence of his battle with alcoholism".
By winning his seat from him in a general election, in which they won almost every seat in the country?The Daily Fail has restarted it's anti SNP hate fest today, claiming activists hounded him to drink again ...