Unfit4Command
Muse
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 730
I've been editing and updating my Pentagon paper over the past few days, and I decided to add the theory that the color of the fireball at the Pentagon somehow is "evidence" that Flight 77 didn't strike the Pentagon.
You've all probably seen the above picture in a debate, or conspiracy video before. But I don't understand how this could be "evidence" of Flight 77 not striking the Pentagon, did any of the "Truth Movement" members who use the above picture and some others even look at any other plane crashes?
This screen shot comes from a video that Killtown sometimes uses to show a plane crash:
Bright, almost white flash initially. Does that mean a plane didn't crash there?
Came from this video btw.
Here's another from a plane that crash landed in Hong Kong:
Another bright, almost white flash initially. Does that mean a plane didn't crash there either? This crash is a lot different though, from what I've read the right wing struck the ground and caught on fire, but it still shows how jet fuel can cause a flash like the one at the Pentagon.
Came from this video.
You can also look at the flash produced by Flight 175 crashing into the South Tower:
Came from this video.
Things like this just make me think that not many people who believe something other than Flight 77 struck the Pentagon do any research on the subject. Especially people who believe the cruise missile theory.
After watching a few videos showing airline crashes, I found a few showing cruise missile strikes.
None of the strikes had results similar to the Pentagon. These are a few of the videos I saw:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBQNnVCHX1I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19XXTArAGaM
I also wasn't able to find a cruise missile that can cause the span of fires, and smoke we all saw at the Pentagon on 9/11.
You've all probably seen the above picture in a debate, or conspiracy video before. But I don't understand how this could be "evidence" of Flight 77 not striking the Pentagon, did any of the "Truth Movement" members who use the above picture and some others even look at any other plane crashes?
This screen shot comes from a video that Killtown sometimes uses to show a plane crash:
Bright, almost white flash initially. Does that mean a plane didn't crash there?
Came from this video btw.
Here's another from a plane that crash landed in Hong Kong:
Another bright, almost white flash initially. Does that mean a plane didn't crash there either? This crash is a lot different though, from what I've read the right wing struck the ground and caught on fire, but it still shows how jet fuel can cause a flash like the one at the Pentagon.
Came from this video.
You can also look at the flash produced by Flight 175 crashing into the South Tower:
Came from this video.
Things like this just make me think that not many people who believe something other than Flight 77 struck the Pentagon do any research on the subject. Especially people who believe the cruise missile theory.
After watching a few videos showing airline crashes, I found a few showing cruise missile strikes.
None of the strikes had results similar to the Pentagon. These are a few of the videos I saw:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBQNnVCHX1I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19XXTArAGaM
I also wasn't able to find a cruise missile that can cause the span of fires, and smoke we all saw at the Pentagon on 9/11.
