• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Booted from the Infowars.com Chatroom

anticonspiracy911

Critical Thinker
A
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
356
So much for the 9/11 Truth Movement's pretense on being for the Bill of Rights 'cause they just eradicated 1/5 of the first amendment about a couple of minutes ago by booting me from the Infowars.com chatroom because apparently I was too critical of the movement. I made mention of the fact that none of the documentaries on 9/11 supporting the conspiracy have any structural engineers in them. That is when one of the posters made a desperate attempt at saying there were tons of them coming out now, and that I won't find out if I don't look. That is when I got the boot from some administrator named Oracle who left me the following: "not today, child." Is that the best they can do?
 
anticonspiracy911 said:
So much for the 9/11 Truth Movement's pretense on being for the Bill of Rights 'cause they just eradicated 1/5 of the first amendment about a couple of minutes ago by booting me from the Infowars.com chatroom because apparently I was too critical of the movement. I made mention of the fact that none of the documentaries on 9/11 supporting the conspiracy have any structural engineers in them. That is when one of the posters made a desperate attempt at saying there were tons of them coming out now, and that I won't find out if I don't look. That is when I got the boot from some administrator named Oracle who left me the following: "not today, child." Is that the best they can do?
Click to expand...

Um, the first amendment has nothing to do with privately run chatrooms. They are well within their "rights" to ban anyone they want for any reason whatsoever. It may be hypocritical, but it's not a violation of the 1st amendment.

But welcome anyway.
 
Spindrift said:
Um, the first amendment has nothing to do with privately run chatrooms. They are well within their "rights" to ban anyone they want for any reason whatsoever. It may be hypocritical, but it's not a violation of the 1st amendment.

But welcome anyway.
Click to expand...


Thank you. It's just comical watching how they get all desperate when someone critical like me questions them.
 
Has anyone else on this forum had to deal with such incidents of being booted or banned from a 9/11 conspiracy website?
 
anticonspiracy911 said:
Has anyone else on this forum had to deal with such incidents of being booted or banned from a 9/11 conspiracy website?
Click to expand...

Welcome on board, anticonspiracy911.
greet010.gif


Actually we have Badges for being banned for no good
reason - to give you a clue concerning your question.
 
anticonspiracy911 said:
Has anyone else on this forum had to deal with such incidents of being booted or banned from a 9/11 conspiracy website?
Click to expand...
I'm one of the few that hasn't, mostly because I haven't been there. After reading up here on what goes on over there, and witnessing the parade of bannings, I figured there wasn't much point in going, because I wouldn't last long anyway.

Anyway, welcome aboard!
 
anticonspiracy911 said:
So much for the 9/11 Truth Movement's pretense on being for the Bill of Rights 'cause they just eradicated 1/5 of the first amendment about a couple of minutes ago by booting me from the Infowars.com chatroom because apparently I was too critical of the movement. I made mention of the fact that none of the documentaries on 9/11 supporting the conspiracy have any structural engineers in them. That is when one of the posters made a desperate attempt at saying there were tons of them coming out now, and that I won't find out if I don't look. That is when I got the boot from some administrator named Oracle who left me the following: "not today, child." Is that the best they can do?
Click to expand...

Oliver is likely busy making you a badge now as we speak...lol

Welcome to the Forum AC911. I get your point. It isnt a violation of the first ammendment, technically, but it does show the hypocracy that underlies their movement, given one of the mantras AJ spues concerns the loss of Constitutional Freedoms that the USA Citizens are losing through the new Police State.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Oliver is likely busy making you a badge now as we speak...lol

Welcome to the Forum AC911. I get your point. It isnt a violation of the first ammendment, technically, but it does show the hypocracy that underlies their movement, given one of the mantras AJ spues concerns the loss of Constitutional Freedoms that the USA Citizens are losing through the new Police State.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Mhmm, i could make a "Infowars Chatroom Badge", but it´s
a pretty unknown, unworthy place, isn´t it? :p
 
Almo said:
Me too. An I was even pretty innocuous on Loose Change. I got banned just for being a member of this forum. :confused:
Click to expand...

I heard stories from skeptics that were
even banned BEFORE signing in!!! :p
 
Last edited:
Oliver said:
I heard stories from skeptics that were
even banned BEFORE signing in!!! :p
Click to expand...

That would be Bell when he tried signing up at Piwots4Twoof. I figured D'oh would give me the same treatment since I made him look like a fool(even for him) and got banned for it after making exactly 2 posts which broke no rules(other than making Jonny stick his foot in his mouth). So, thanks to Bell, I knew not to use my JREF nick there and I am maintaing a deep cover sock that I'd rather not talk about....
 
I'm almost inclined to join LC just to get banned...I hate being left out of the party :D
 
I'm going to be a wet blanket here; from the 40,000' view, the only difference between proxy-access to LCF and pdoh, et al's, sock-puppetry here, is that the JREF forum rules explicitly forbid sock-puppetry.

Might do well to keep that in mind.

Just because LCF's bannings tend to be flippant does not necessarily excuse bypassing said bans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom