In orange terror alerts, wary cities hold back
When U.S. officials first used a color-coded system to issue a national terrorism alert last September, Phoenix police fell in line with virtually all city and state law enforcement agencies.
"We went full bore," Police Chief Harold Hurtt says of Phoenix's response to the Code Orange alert, which indicated there was a high risk of an attack. "We put people on 12-hour shifts, canceled time off. We put people everywhere." Officers guarded power plants and a gasoline supply depot, and security was increased at Bank One Ballpark, the retractable-roof baseball stadium where the Arizona Diamondbacks play.
But by the time U.S. officials had relaxed the threat level two weeks later, Hurtt had concluded that absent a direct threat to Phoenix, his department couldn't afford to jump every time officials in Washington, D.C., said to do so. Since the inception of the Alert system back in 2001, the nation has gone to the second highest orange alert four times.
Now, a growing number of city and state officials are following Hurtt's lead. Plagued by tight budgets and fatigued officers — and still frustrated by a lack of specific information from the U.S. government about threats — officials nationwide are cutting back their responses to federal terrorism alerts.
Some officials, questioning the value of the federal alerts, are designing their own regional warning systems that kick into gear only when there is a specific threat to their area.
[...]
But beyond Washington, D.C., and New York, the U.S. cities that have been at the top of al-Qaeda's hit list, the sense of urgency that followed the September alert is evaporating. For many law enforcement officials, the nationwide alerts have been unfocused scrambles, a guessing game over what to guard based on slivers of information of unknown reliability.
"There is broad consensus that the (federal alert) system just isn't effective," Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske says. "It isn't working."