• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

attack on Iran **WILL START** within next 6 months

oahuoahu

Thinker
O
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
168
The U.S. carrier fleets near the middle east cannot last for more than 6-8 months. They've already been there for a while.

Expect an attack on IRAN within the next 6 months.

Possibly with Isreal starting it, but we may both go at the same time.

Will there be a terror attack carried out to precede attacks on Iran? Most likely but Isreal may just hit without an attack.






These are just my educated guesses, based on the navy battle and carrier fleets in the region and the PR's being released saying Iran is helping Iraq terrorists and insurgencies.
 
I thought it was scheduled for last October, just before the mid-term elections. That's what JohnDoeX told me and he never lies.
 
Why would it matter if they only stay there for 6-8 months, they swap out.
We've had CBGs there for probably longer than you've been alive. No big deal.
 
I'm not putting any money on it till Alex Jones weighs in.

.... He's always right about this stuff.
 
oahuoahu said:
The U.S. carrier fleets near the middle east cannot last for more than 6-8 months. They've already been there for a while.

Expect an attack on IRAN within the next 6 months.

Possibly with Isreal starting it, but we may both go at the same time.

Will there be a terror attack carried out to precede attacks on Iran? Most likely but Isreal may just hit without an attack.


These are just my educated guesses, based on the navy battle and carrier fleets in the region and the PR's being released saying Iran is helping Iraq terrorists and insurgencies.
Click to expand...
When your IQ hits 50, sell.

Carrier battle groups rotate on roughly six month deployment cycles. One leaves, another takes it place.

Beyond that, your post is risible and not worthy of further comment.

DR
 
There were US ships in the gulf when Iran was an ally. There are US ships stationed around many countries, allies or not. Also, with the quagmire that the US has with Iraq and Afghanistan, invading Iran won't be a very sensible option since they have their hands tied in the two countries already...
 
Here we have a classic symptom of "conspiratosis." Conspiracy guys honest-to-God think they can predict the future. This is because they see through the facade of things. They never notice that their predictions are always wrong.
 
I must say that I too worry about an impending American or Israeli attack against Iran. It may simply take one lucky Shiite suicide bomber to start the deal. I do not think there will be a "false-flag" attack to inspire it, but all this sabre raddling about Iranian nukes, support for Shiite militias, should make Americans nervous. We cannot allow Bush to strike Iran without congressional authorization.
 
I bet in the neartime future, A US warship will accidentally shoot down an Iranian passanger plane. And this will start WW 7
 
oahuoahu said:
The U.S. carrier fleets near the middle east cannot last for more than 6-8 months. They've already been there for a while.

Expect an attack on IRAN within the next 6 months.

Possibly with Isreal starting it, but we may both go at the same time.

Will there be a terror attack carried out to precede attacks on Iran? Most likely but Isreal may just hit without an attack.






These are just my educated guesses, based on the navy battle and carrier fleets in the region and the PR's being released saying Iran is helping Iraq terrorists and insurgencies.
Click to expand...


I wonder? Can we truthers blame you guys? If the attack happens as predicted and 100 000's innocent iranians dies.

I mean instaed of spending your miserable lifes chasing after us truthers. You could have joined us in our quest for truth and expose the criminal Bush regime, Thus stopping the attack on Iran.

Keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use insults.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pagan said:
I wonder? Can we truthers blame you guys? If the attack happens as predicted and 100 000's innocent iranians dies.

I mean instaed of spending your miserable lifes chasing after us truthers. You could have joined us in our quest for truth and expose the criminal Bush regime, Thus stopping the attack on Iran.
Click to expand...

You do know that this is a skeptic sight, and you came here, right? So who is chasing whom?
 
pagan said:
I wonder? Can we truthers blame you guys? If the attack happens as predicted and 100 000's innocent iranians dies.

I mean instaed of spending your miserable lifes chasing after us truthers. You could have joined us in our quest for truth and expose the criminal Bush regime, Thus stopping the attack on Iran.
Click to expand...

Problem with that is you aren't exposing anything except your ignorance. If you were actually attacking real abuses of power by the Bush admin instead of crazy fantasies, you might have a point.

As others have pointed out the "truth movement" actually helps Bush by distracting people from real issues.
 
oahuoahu - please make certain you start your threads in the correct subforum. This is a political topic, not a conspiracy theory.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
pagan said:
I wonder? Can we truthers blame you guys? If the attack happens as predicted and 100 000's innocent iranians dies.

I mean instaed of spending your miserable lifes chasing after us truthers. You could have joined us in our quest for truth and expose the criminal Bush regime, Thus stopping the attack on Iran.

Keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use insults.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
Click to expand...

Alternatively, when no such attacks occurs (and anyone with more than a passing knowledge of politics, history, the military or geography would know why) perhaps you will shut up and mind the people who don't get their worldview from Alex Jones.
 
Last edited:
oahuoahu said:
The U.S. carrier fleets near the middle east cannot last for more than 6-8 months. They've already been there for a while.

Expect an attack on IRAN within the next 6 months.

Possibly with Isreal starting it, but we may both go at the same time.

Will there be a terror attack carried out to precede attacks on Iran? Most likely but Isreal may just hit without an attack.

These are just my educated guesses, based on the navy battle and carrier fleets in the region and the PR's being released saying Iran is helping Iraq terrorists and insurgencies.
Click to expand...


DNFT......DNFT......DNFT.......DNFT.........DNFT........DNFT........DNFT..........

This character also has started/restarted one of the income tax being a labor tax and therefore illegal. Just your average troller. Please do not feed!!!
 
oahuoahu said:
The U.S. carrier fleets near the middle east cannot last for more than 6-8 months. They've already been there for a while.

Expect an attack on IRAN within the next 6 months.

Possibly with Isreal starting it, but we may both go at the same time.

Will there be a terror attack carried out to precede attacks on Iran? Most likely but Isreal may just hit without an attack.

These are just my educated guesses, based on the navy battle and carrier fleets in the region and the PR's being released saying Iran is helping Iraq terrorists and insurgencies.
Click to expand...
It's possible.

If November 7th had NOT happened as it did - let's assume the Republicans would have maintained complete and unassailable power - then I'd say your declaration would be very very possible. But, we have a government again, so we'll see.

Bush/Cheney would LIKE to invade Iran - in their minds, they need to widen the war and thereby diffuse the blame. In my opinion, obviously.

I was in a carrier battle group - on the flattop - and our "cruises" lasted 7 months. But they can last longer - that time frame is not etched in stone. We were a conventionally powered carrier, but these nukes can stay out there longer. They still require a lot of logistics for resupply, however.

In fact my carrier was relieved by the USS Nimitz back in September, 1979. Instead of the standard 7-month deployment, the Nimitz was gone for 8 and a half months. That's because of the (failed) rescue mission of the Iran hostages - the 8 helos involved were aboard the Nimitz.

In November, 2002, I predicted an invasion of Iraq - I was hands-down certain. Wished I'd have been wrong about that.

And I wish you'll be wrong about this.
 
CptColumbo said:
You do know that this is a skeptic sight, and you came here, right? So who is chasing whom?
Click to expand...
CC, I am sure you meant to say "this is a skeptic site" in your blistering riposte to pagan.

Way to let the side down, CC. :(

DR
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom