ASA decision on homeopathic leaflet

Mojo

Mostly harmless
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
42,962
Location
Nor Flanden
The UK Advertising Standards Authority has published an adjudication about a leaflet put out by a homoeopath:

Archway House Natural Health Centre t/a The Harborough Asthma and Eczema Clinic for Kids

They upheld complaints about four issues, finding that the leaflet breached the sections of the CAP code relating to substantiation, truthfulness, responsible advertising, testimonials and endorsements, and health & beauty products and therapies - general.

In particular they found that the words "we look at the causes of allergies, not the symptoms ... Although creams and puffers can provide temporary relief, they're not offering your child a cure. Homeopathy is different; it seeks to address the triggers for asthma and eczema ..." in the leaflet "misleadingly implied that homeopathy offered a cure for asthma and eczema by addressing the causes of those conditions".

Interestingly, this leaflet had already been the subject of a complaint to the Society of Homeopaths, with whom the homoeopath in question is registered, about possible breaches of the SoH's Code of Ethics and Practice, which among other things states that "no advertising may be used which expressly or implicitly claims to cure named diseases" (section 48) and that homeopaths must "avoid making claims (whether explicit or implied; orally or in writing) implying cure of any named disease" (section 72). The Society of Homeopaths decided that the leaflet didn't breach their code.

The ASA also found that the advertiser was unable to substantiate a claim that homoeopathy "helps alleviate the flaring skin and tightening lungs of your child's allergic reactions", found that the advertisement was irresponsible because its suggestion that conventional medicine was less effective than homoeopathy in treating asthma and eczema was likely to discourage people from seeking medical advice, and found that the testimonials in the leaflet could not be authenticated

For more details see the coverage on the Quackometer blog:

The Society of Homeopaths: The Failure of Self Regulation

Homeopaths Through the Looking-Glass
 
Last edited:
Excellent. Score one for sanity.

When my internet connection decides that it will speed up, I'll check out the quackometer stuff.
 
The ASA upheld all four of the points of complaint made about the leaflet. The last concerned the veracity of the testimonials mentioned on the leaflet including one of a certain Harry Potter. This was upheld because Archway House could supply no proof for the testimonials. This is surprising. The final fall back position of homeopaths is that patients feel better after their non-treatment. But it seems they cannot even find proof of this claim.

As the SoH made attempts to silence LCN because of his comments on this and other homeopathic claims, they will presumably be framing a suitable apology at this very moment. :rolleyes:
 
Oh noes!!! Harry Potter isn't real!!!

No no, Harry Potter is real. It's just that homeopaths cannot prove him.

LOL just googled 'harry potter homeopathy and it scored 239,000 hits :D
 

Back
Top Bottom