EatatJoes
Fundamental Atheist
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
- Messages
- 339
A friend sent me this link. I think most of the verbiage used is of the "I don't think that means what you think it means" variety. An example:
"This brings us back to Gariaev's holographic soliton projection model, where resonant nonlinear wave combinations result in standing-wave blueprints involved with the generation of matter, at scales ranging from "virtual particle" fields operating in the physical Vacuum, to the formations of galactic clusters. Dimensionally encoded solitons may generate from these ambient fields, creating exact replicas of themselves in the cellular range, this process implementing Sheldrake's morphogenic causational principles.
Further on, non-local Information transfers, circumventing biochemical chains, have been amply documented in recent explorations reported by Huping Hu & All. The Hu experiments efficiently strengthen our view that Quantum entities inside the Brain may Informationally interact with various external information structures. Though our interpretation of Quantum Entanglement slightly differs from the Hu team's "spin-spin interaction" chain, Quantum Entanglement connects system to observer, achieving decoherence by non-local interactions with the ambient environment. Such context-dependent coupling implies new types of non-local information connections, which are much stronger then standard quantum correlations.
From this perspective, no truly random sequence can exist, and no recursive random sequence can be considered truly random. These interactions are more complex then any recursive mathematical sequence. This complexity derives from higher orders of universal implication levels, where hidden determinism and "hidden variables" are observable, as per the PEAR results mentioned mentioned earlier. Information conveyed by the superluminal SQ particles which produce Quantum entanglements, may explain how pharmacodynamic chemistries are actually causing neural correlations in the Brain, as well as properly explaining the previously wrongly-interpreted synchronizations of cognitive effects, relative to the applied mechanical neural-triggering procedures, when such triggering procedures are applied to selected neurological configurations."
Anybody in the respective fields of science want to read this and give me, even a basic, outline of what this is? Is the 'logic' of this "article" consistent? Do the words they use mean what they think they mean?
"This brings us back to Gariaev's holographic soliton projection model, where resonant nonlinear wave combinations result in standing-wave blueprints involved with the generation of matter, at scales ranging from "virtual particle" fields operating in the physical Vacuum, to the formations of galactic clusters. Dimensionally encoded solitons may generate from these ambient fields, creating exact replicas of themselves in the cellular range, this process implementing Sheldrake's morphogenic causational principles.
Further on, non-local Information transfers, circumventing biochemical chains, have been amply documented in recent explorations reported by Huping Hu & All. The Hu experiments efficiently strengthen our view that Quantum entities inside the Brain may Informationally interact with various external information structures. Though our interpretation of Quantum Entanglement slightly differs from the Hu team's "spin-spin interaction" chain, Quantum Entanglement connects system to observer, achieving decoherence by non-local interactions with the ambient environment. Such context-dependent coupling implies new types of non-local information connections, which are much stronger then standard quantum correlations.
From this perspective, no truly random sequence can exist, and no recursive random sequence can be considered truly random. These interactions are more complex then any recursive mathematical sequence. This complexity derives from higher orders of universal implication levels, where hidden determinism and "hidden variables" are observable, as per the PEAR results mentioned mentioned earlier. Information conveyed by the superluminal SQ particles which produce Quantum entanglements, may explain how pharmacodynamic chemistries are actually causing neural correlations in the Brain, as well as properly explaining the previously wrongly-interpreted synchronizations of cognitive effects, relative to the applied mechanical neural-triggering procedures, when such triggering procedures are applied to selected neurological configurations."
Anybody in the respective fields of science want to read this and give me, even a basic, outline of what this is? Is the 'logic' of this "article" consistent? Do the words they use mean what they think they mean?
