Another conspiracy theory
- Thread starter Jono
- Start date
-
- Tags
- conspiracy theory
zenith-nadir
Illuminator
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2004
- Messages
- 4,482
I just have one question. How did America convince the arab hijackers to go through with the plot and Bin Laden to take credit for it? Funny the website doesn't seem to tackle that plot hole. 
Hutch
A broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barret
Got a pretty lively thread going on this very topic over in the Skepticsim subfora: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53102
There never were any Arab hijackers, the planes were send into the buildings using remote controls, except for the Penatgon where there actually was no plane at all, but rather a missile. A fact that may be easilly deduced form the rather small hole, and the fact that the Governement quickly confiscated videos of the "plane" crashing inot the building. As for Bin Laden it's a well known fact that he's a US agent.I just have one question. How did America convince the arab hijackers to go through with the plot and Bin Laden to take credit for it? Funny the website doesn't seem to tackle that plot hole.
Hutch
A broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barret
Oh, they were taken to a secret military base and quietly "liquidated" along with the planes that didn't crash into the WTC. Kerberos shoudl have used a
, but probably thought it was redundant.Please, check out the thread I posted above, you'll begin to get an idea where the CT-mindset is coming from.
Oh, they were taken to a secret military base and quietly "liquidated" along with the planes that didn't crash into the WTC. Kerberos shoudl have used a
Please, check out the thread I posted above, you'll begin to get an idea where the CT-mindset is coming from.
I figured it was probably tongue in cheek, I just wanted to know where the theory went.