• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Alex Jones names the Jew in Charlottesville riots

Saggy said:
You can read about it in Harretz,

Conspiracy Theorist Alex Jones: Jewish Actors Posed as KKK in Charlottesville
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/us-news/1.806924

See the clip ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypHV1TAEC6o

AJ says the Charlottesville Nazis look like Howard Stern !
Click to expand...

Amusing. AJ has eaten the insanity peppers. Everyone with the exception of a very few cranks thinks he is flat out bonkers.

If you want to wed yourself to that flat out insanity, nobody can stop you.
 
abaddon said:
Amusing. AJ has eaten the insanity peppers. Everyone with the exception of a very few cranks thinks he is flat out bonkers.

If you want to wed yourself to that flat out insanity, nobody can stop you.
Click to expand...

AJ has been eating the insanity peppers for a long,long, time.
Only thing new is he is not bothering to hide his Anti Semitism now.
 
Last edited:
abaddon said:
Amusing. AJ has eaten the insanity peppers. Everyone with the exception of a very few cranks thinks he is flat out bonkers.

If you want to wed yourself to that flat out insanity, nobody can stop you.
Click to expand...
Re: the embiggening and engreening by me...... They cannot stop you, but you will face extreme buggery and related from what you wed!!!!
 
Wait a minute ..... we know how awful these racists are ..... I suppose .... but here we have a major newspaper calling for an end of the right to peaceful assembly ...

‘Jews will not replace us’: Why white supremacists go after Jews

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are. When white supremacists are viciously attacking Jews as nonwhite impostors, then any anti-racists worthy of the name must be there to defend them."

Let's see what the Constitution has to say about peaceful assembly ..

"[1] The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But, hey, if you can't trash to Constitution to confront racism, what can you trash it for?
 
Saggy said:
Wait a minute ..... we know how awful these racists are ..... I suppose .... but here we have a major newspaper calling for an end of the right to peaceful assembly ...

‘Jews will not replace us’: Why white supremacists go after Jews

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are. When white supremacists are viciously attacking Jews as nonwhite impostors, then any anti-racists worthy of the name must be there to defend them."

Let's see what the Constitution has to say about peaceful assembly ..

"[1] The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But, hey, if you can't trash to Constitution to confront racism, what can you trash it for?
Click to expand...

Major newspapers have called for all manner of unconstitutional measures, fully protected by the 1st Amendment.

https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie

I'm willing to bet the ACLU will have their say in court over any restrictions on peaceable assemblies, even those of the pointy-hat club.
 
Saggy said:
Wait a minute ..... we know how awful these racists are ..... I suppose .... but here we have a major newspaper calling for an end of the right to peaceful assembly ...

‘Jews will not replace us’: Why white supremacists go after Jews

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are. When white supremacists are viciously attacking Jews as nonwhite impostors, then any anti-racists worthy of the name must be there to defend them."

Let's see what the Constitution has to say about peaceful assembly ..

"[1] The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But, hey, if you can't trash to Constitution to confront racism, what can you trash it for?
Click to expand...

Did you get that from the Daily Stormer and not bother to read it? Because that's not what the article is about.
 
Saggy said:
. .... but here we have a major newspaper calling for an end of the right to peaceful assembly ...

‘Jews will not replace us’: Why white supremacists go after Jews

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are. When white supremacists are viciously attacking Jews as nonwhite impostors, then any anti-racists worthy of the name must be there to defend them."
Click to expand...

Wait a minute. You are equating a confrontation to the end of peaceful assembly? That is a bit of a reach. Is your right to peacefully assembly infringed upon if I object to what you say where you say it? I think not. What about the counter-protester's right to peaceably assemble?

Ranb
 
And Nazi Germany was such a great example of Free Speech.
Sorry, but my symphathy for Nazis whining about there free speech being violated is about zero.
 
Saggy said:
Wait a minute ..... we know how awful these racists are ..... I suppose .... but here we have a major newspaper calling for an end of the right to peaceful assembly ...

‘Jews will not replace us’: Why white supremacists go after Jews

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are. When white supremacists are viciously attacking Jews as nonwhite impostors, then any anti-racists worthy of the name must be there to defend them."

Let's see what the Constitution has to say about peaceful assembly ..

"[1] The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But, hey, if you can't trash to Constitution to confront racism, what can you trash it for?
Click to expand...
Unpeaceable on the other hand is a fair target!!!!!!!!
 
Saggy said:
Wait a minute ..... we know how awful these racists are ..... I suppose .... but here we have a major newspaper calling for an end of the right to peaceful assembly ...

‘Jews will not replace us’: Why white supremacists go after Jews

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are. When white supremacists are viciously attacking Jews as nonwhite impostors, then any anti-racists worthy of the name must be there to defend them."

Let's see what the Constitution has to say about peaceful assembly ..

"[1] The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

But, hey, if you can't trash to Constitution to confront racism, what can you trash it for?
Click to expand...

You realise that the Constitution only protects you against Government actions right? That's why it says "Congress shall make no law.." There is nothing Unconstitutional about counter protests nor in me standing next to you with a bullhorn drowning you out. You have no 1st Amendment rights again me or any other private person because doing a counter protest or shouting you down are also protected speech and rights of assembly under the 1st Amendment.
 
Ranb said:
Wait a minute. You are equating a confrontation to the end of peaceful assembly? That is a bit of a reach.
Click to expand...

It's not a reach at all. The article reads ...

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are."

and we know that antifa shows up with mace and baseball bats.

Antifa has a long history of attempting to shut down anti-Jewish speech in the US. It is not a debating society.

And the Washington Post, one of the most influential papers in the country (?), is now owned by Jeff Bezos, and we know that the ADL tells Bezos what books he can sell on Amazon, so we can assume they can tell him what information to publish in the paper.
 
Last edited:
Saggy said:
It's not a reach at all. The article reads ...

"As such, any serious anti-racist effort needs to confront the racists where they are."
Click to expand...
Anyone and everyone who really cares about their opinion needs to be doing this. The nazis are doing this was well as eveyone else who hates their guts.

and we know that antifa shows up with mace and baseball bats.
Click to expand...
And what was the body count from those bats? Zero if I recall.

The nazi's showed up with a car; body count of one.

Antifa has a long history of attempting to shut down anti-Jewish speech in the US. It is not a debating society.
Click to expand...
But you can't even give me one example?


And as said above, the 1st amendment protects you from government interference; not from me or anyone who offends you.
 
Last edited:
Saggy said:
Of course I can give 10 examples, but would probably get a warning for it. Use google for Christ's sake.
Click to expand...
I'm sure I can find examples of anyone behaving badly. Not sure you are willing to though. I doubt that you would get a warning for providing a link to a factual article describing an event.

I've answered your questions; can I expect the same in return?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom