Oualawouzou
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2007
- Messages
- 490
Hello everybody,
In my first year of high school, I had a religion teacher who was *quite* obviously a non-believer. When reading passages stating "And God said to Buddy Joe...", he would stop, raise his head, say "What this means is that Buddy Joe was thinking, talking to himself", then resume his reading.
However, some of his attempts at rationnal explanations threw my BS meter in a frenzy. Like when he argued that the parting of the Red Sea was due to Moses and cie witnessing the effects of tides, "something unknown at the time". Ouch. Ouch ouch ouch. Humankind strived along the borders of the sea. How could they not know about tides, even several dozen centuries ago?
But another of his explanations had to do with ages in the OT. You know, famous OT figures tended to have rather extraordinary long life. His explanation was that at the time, the Jewish people counted the age of someone not by the number of years elapsed, but by which important events happened in his life. Got married? Get a few years. Got a child? Get a few years. etc...
This always struck me as weird and a nightmare to manage. I mean, were there official events-to-years conversion tables? Could you get younger as significant events are declared null and void (repudiate your wife, discover you're not the father of your child, etc.)?
I'm just wondering if his explanation has some shreds of truth (I think not, but what do I know?) and where it may have come from (perhaps a mangled version of something else?).
Thanks!
In my first year of high school, I had a religion teacher who was *quite* obviously a non-believer. When reading passages stating "And God said to Buddy Joe...", he would stop, raise his head, say "What this means is that Buddy Joe was thinking, talking to himself", then resume his reading.
However, some of his attempts at rationnal explanations threw my BS meter in a frenzy. Like when he argued that the parting of the Red Sea was due to Moses and cie witnessing the effects of tides, "something unknown at the time". Ouch. Ouch ouch ouch. Humankind strived along the borders of the sea. How could they not know about tides, even several dozen centuries ago?
But another of his explanations had to do with ages in the OT. You know, famous OT figures tended to have rather extraordinary long life. His explanation was that at the time, the Jewish people counted the age of someone not by the number of years elapsed, but by which important events happened in his life. Got married? Get a few years. Got a child? Get a few years. etc...
This always struck me as weird and a nightmare to manage. I mean, were there official events-to-years conversion tables? Could you get younger as significant events are declared null and void (repudiate your wife, discover you're not the father of your child, etc.)?
I'm just wondering if his explanation has some shreds of truth (I think not, but what do I know?) and where it may have come from (perhaps a mangled version of something else?).
Thanks!