A Slogan that needs some work (Iran's latest)

Skeptic

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
18,312
From http://www.bangkokpost.com/breaking_news/breakingnews.php?id=78985

(In a rally where whatshisname called the holocaust a myth and said the Palestinians "and other nations" will destroy israel):

While chanting "Death to America", "Death of Israel" and "Nuclear energy is our undisputable right", the crowd walked toward the Azadi (Freedom) Square in Tehran where Ahmadinejad held his annual speech.

That last one must be a hell of a slogal to chant. Must sound better in Farsi. I wonder how strikes and sit-ins work in Teheran, though:

"Chanting 'Death to America', 'Death of israel', and 'we demand a 16% increase for overtime on holidays', workers in the local..."

P.S.

Thank God "Iran is a democracy", as certain people who shall not be named on this forum explained to us. How much worse it would have been if it were a genocidal theocratic lunatic asylum?
 
"what do we want?"

"Our undisputable right to nuclear energy!"

"when do we want it?"

"NOW!"

Rolls of the tongue.
 
The real meaning, "Nuking the Zionist Entity is our undisputable right!" is even clunkier. That's why they shortened it.
 
"We're here! We're queer! We seek a commonsense approach to the exploration of nuclear energy as a viable option to supply electricity to our nation without using it to pursue weapons research in any fashion! Get used to it!"
 
"We're here! We're queer! We seek a commonsense approach to the exploration of nuclear energy as a viable option to supply electricity to our nation without using it to pursue weapons research in any fashion! Get used to it!"
:dl:

just great.
 
"We're here! We're queer! We seek a commonsense approach to the exploration of nuclear energy as a viable option to supply electricity to our nation without using it to pursue weapons research in any fashion! Get used to it!"

Post of the month.
 
Americans are pig-dogs
The Jews just as bad.

Draw cartoons of Muhammed
and we'll start a ji-had.


The Danes they are evil
The Jews they are swine

Insult our great prophet
And you'll hear us whine.



So c'mon all you infidels
and put up your dukes..

By the end of the year
We can kill you with nukes...........



Probably still needs a little work...
 
Forget Ali Baba
and his lamp & his genie...

We're all rooting for
Ayotollah Khomeni



Paradise beckons
says Allah from on high

Just spit on the infidel
Stick a fork in his eye



Islam is peaceful
says Abdul & Achmed

and if you don't believe us
we'll cut off your head.....




This is almost fun......if the possible consequences weren't so deadly serious.

I was thinking of starting a poll.....

Which do you prefer?

A. More US & Zionist hypocrisy or.....

B. The likely consequences of allowing Iran to have nukes.


As far as the idea that we CAN'T stop Iran from obtaining these things....I disagree...we can. It's just a matter of having the will to do so.
 
Europe will alter










It's appeasement stance











When Iran's missles











Reach Paris, France











Burma Shave
 
Last edited:
Americans are pig-dogs
The Jews just as bad.

Draw cartoons of Muhammed
and we'll start a ji-had.

The Danes they are evil
The Jews they are swine

Insult our great prophet
And you'll hear us whine.

So c'mon all you infidels
and put up your dukes..

By the end of the year
We can kill you with nukes...........

Edited for scansion:

Americans are pig-dogs.
The Jews are just as bad.

Draw cartoons of Mohammed,
And we will start ji-had.

The Danish are all evil.
The Jews, they all are swine.

Insult our holy Prophet,
And we will moan and whine.

So Infidels just come on.
And put right up your dukes.

By the very end of this year
We'll kill you all with nukes.

I'm thinking of a tune that goes for each couplet:

E-A-A-A-G-A-BB
E-G-G-F-F-GGG
 
Last edited:
Europe will alter
It's appeasement stance
When Iran's missles
Reach Paris, France.

If such were to happen, should the US reply in kind to Iran after the first hit? ... or should we wait until after the second or third? After all, that first one may just have been a mistake, you know. We wouldn't want to upset anyone or seem insensitive.
 
If such were to happen, should the US reply in kind to Iran after the first hit? ... or should we wait until after the second or third? After all, that first one may just have been a mistake, you know. We wouldn't want to upset anyone or seem insensitive.

It might be the work of the radical minority and hasty conclusions might be misplaced.
 

Back
Top Bottom