Let's only kill people whose crime is to exist in the first place. That's way worse than killing a bunch of people and eating their children, after all.[?Quote]
Totally pulled out of the Rushblob's underwear.
Yes, let's dispose of all our hazardous wastes above ground, which is much safer for us. Right?
Well, DUH! It isn't in the aquifer if it is above ground, is it?
Yes, let's use the wonderful oil and coal instead. They've been proven to be viable, safe and clean sources of energy, with nearly infinite supply.
It will be a while before we can do without fossil fuels. It will be longer than any of us have left on earth for a nuke plant to pay for itself and then to become less-than-lethal to a cockroach at the end of its serviceability.
That said, I'm sure the US Navy and about 70% of France would disagree. Among others.
Navy hasn't many other options, and France is...well..France. That they elected Sarkozy indicates that they may be in decline intellectually.
Let's spend even more money. You proposed a balancing of budget somewhere down the line, but about half of the platform is about increasing spending in this or that area. That doesn't seem to dissuade you.
Promises made to working people MUST be kept. That the fat class think that the country will shrivel and die if the Shrub's tax give-aways are clawed back is a delusional belief. The pensions need to be defended, to the last drop of investor-class blood, if need be. The fat class would not be fat but for the contributions that the working class made to society.
So ... um ... how does this work, exactly??
We stop telling other countries who they can elect. We stop dangling loans in front of tin-pot dictators on the condition that they open their markets to our corporations, regardless what it does to small businesses, or how much land is taken out of food production to feed the people. We don't invade vulnerable countries just because their tin-pot dictator tried to off POTUS who tried to off the tin-pot dictator.
Some people deserve to be privileged above all others based on their nationality alone. That "no discrimination" clause above is really just for show, I guess.
The only alternative would be to nullify the treaties by which we got the land and give it all back to the indigenous peoples. They got really screwed on the treaties. They were supposed to enjoy the use of the land "except where staked and cultivated" for "as long as the rivers shall run."
How were they supposed to know that we would stake and cultivate the beaches and the shallow water and make the rivers stop running?
Let's give religious organizations a very good reason to classify themselves as a business and have them actively push certain political options. Yes, that is a wise decision which will undoubtedly support the separation of church and state, which you support.
Well, we're working on the part about getting business out of government, too. First, though, it looks like we will have to wait for one rightwhacker idiot on the Supreme Court to quit or croak.
