• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

nist report

  1. Oystein

    NIST-Reports - Mirror or copy, anybody?

    Hey all, in more than a year, I have not been able to download any PDFs from the NIST's pages on WTC. I get endless shows of the hourglass and eventually timeouts. I don't have several parts of the WTC1+2 reports, for example I could not find the part where they tested the behaviour of the...
  2. F

    Any update on the disagreement between CTBUH and NIST report?

    Did this discussion go on anywhere I couldn't find? Anyone knows of any updated link on the subject? http://wtc.nist.gov/comments08/CTBUHwtc7comments.pdf Thanks in advance
  3. P

    NIST raw data?

    Hi, I wonder how much of the raw data NIST used for calculations and simulations that are available to the public? And how much of it that has been reviewed by peers that had access to it. Does anyone know? We are discussing 911 in another forum (btw, Heiwa continued his "heiwa challenge"...
  4. T

    Did the NIST get the core column factors of safety wrong in the twin towers?

    I have discussed the issue of factor of safety of the columns in the twin towers several times with different posters on this forum yet it has never had its own thread. Presently there is a thread which discusses Mark Gaffney and one of the issues there is factor of safety. This thread is...
  5. L

    Are there any other reports about WTC 7?

    I was just wondering because I couldn't find anything else other than the final report by NIST.
  6. bofors

    Analysis of Bazant & Zhou (2002)

    As the NIST report rests on the Bazant & Zhou (2002) is the place to start in taking apart the official theory of "collapse" in WTC twin tower on 9/11. The paper is here: http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf Point 1 This paper was "rapid communication". It...
  7. T

    WTC7 NIST Final Report - Truthers not even willing to wait...

    http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id405.html Seems some in the truth movement are not even going to wait for the NIST final report on WTC7 to come out before calling it Shill/disinfo... To be exact, here is an exerpt from the full article linked to above... Bolding mine. TAM:)
  8. I Am He

    Need Some Help

    I'm wondering if someone could Help me with this. Does the N.I.S.T. Report cover the collapse WTC7? This guy says it say it does not. (below) Thank You, I Am He "Perhaps you would like to educate us, by posting alink to the section of the NIST report that explains the collapse of WTC7. And...
  9. Y

    So... what DID happen on 9/11?

    I thought about making one thread where people can dump in what they think happened on 9/11. Because, you know, since the 9/11 Commission Report is flawed... and the NIST report is lacking in a couple subjects, as we now know... a thread that explain some things by citing sources would be...
  10. Hokulele

    Reading NIST

    This is inspired in part by the FoolMeWunz and ChipmunkStew polls, the comments from Apollo20, as well as the recent petition to revise (or review) the NIST report on September 11. After many months of seeing references to this report, I am starting to understand how important it is for me to...
  11. C

    Merged The *REAL* REAL Take on the NIST Report

    Since a few people suggested improvements on "The REAL Take on the NIST Report", I thought I'd redo it, taking those suggestions into account (with apologies to Foolmewunz) You can choose multiple options, and your user name will be visible. Please be patient while I build the poll. It will...
  12. Foolmewunz

    The REAL Take on the NIST Report

    THIS POLL IS NOT ANONYMOUS. YOUR VOTE WILL BE ASCRIBED TO YOU. There have been numerous comments of late that the CT debunkers have developed a dogmatic acceptance of the NIST Report. From Greening to Childlike Empress to several of "our own" (meaning regular posters in the CT section)...
  13. Horatius

    To all the Ctists out there - Please read this week's commentary

    A lot of Ctists argue that the NIST report can't be trusted, in part because the government-paid scientists and engineers would be reluctant to endanger their paychecks. They argue that no one would risk being fired from their government backed job by speaking out against the political influence...
  14. Quad4_72

    Question for the twoofers about why NIST is wrong

    Ok so I would like you to shed some light on this for me twoofers. Why is the NIST report wrong? Using actual scientific data and physics, why is it not possible for the towers to collapse the way NIST said that they did? What specifically did they mess up on? Here are some unacceptable answers...
  15. Garb

    NIST report incorrect?

    Alright so I got this "paper" of some sorts from a guy on another forum and it supposedly shows how the NIST report is incorrect. Honestly all I've seen is attempts to discredit the report by talking about how some of the scientists are related to the government, but I just want to make sure I...
  16. U

    The WTC cores

    Lately I've been trying to find some info about the WTC cores since I've been hearing a lot of stuff from the Truth Movement about how they should have remained standing, and even should have possibly held the rest of the building up. I need to know more about the construction of them. I've...

Back
Top Bottom