theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
Perhaps, but we're not talking about those pornographers. We're talking about the producers of "barely legal" content. That phrase - barely legal - is indeed the scruple you say they lack. Barely legal is another way of saying entirely legal.Some pornographers don't scruple to portray them as underage,
Hopefully I've now cleared up your confusion on this point.so I am puzzled by your assertion to the contrary.
I have no opinion about that. I thought you planned to attack legal porn on its merits, and were looking for someone to defend it on its merits. My defense is that it has the merit of being legal porn. That defense holds true no matter how many people (statistically) smuggle it across borders.If we assume that director Nolot is correct in stating that such depictions are illegal in most countries (his website asserts only 15 countries allow it), then it's statistically going to be the case that consuming it is going to be illegal (unless, of course, the countries that do allow it are all the high population ones).
Because it's legal. No country has the power to prohibit some other country's legal expressions. It's illegal to insult the king of Thailand - if you're in Thailand. I can get away with calling him a womanizing spendthrift and an overall jackass, because it's not illegal here, nor is it illegal where this forum is hosted. Even though officials in Thailand can log in here and read my words if they wish, I can still get away with it because it's still legal for me to do it.The questing remains: how is this industry getting away with it?
