Mycroft
High Priest of Ed
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2003
- Messages
- 20,501
They got rid of the Turks alright, as soon as they had the chance to.
After 500 years is hardly "as soon as they had the chance", but don't let that interrupt your revisionist history lesson.
The objection to Jews buying land was that the Jews were quite open about the purpose, it was to create a new state for jews right where they lived.
Yes and no. Before the Balfour Declaration there were different ideas floated about what "Zionism" would produce. Herzl wrote about a non-state entity where all people of all religions and backgrounds would live together harmoniously.
But more importantly...so what? If someone were to create a "state for Mormons" (or whatever) right where you lived, how would you be harmed by that? What specifically do you think would happen that in your mind justifies starting a race war?
If Japanese, English, Eskimos had the same aim, the reaction would have been no different. Throughout history, in similar circumstances, it has often involved a violent reaction.
I think if you take a closer look at history, you see violent reactions where the rights of peoples are trampled on.
The Hawaiians, for example, didn't object when the United States created an "American State" "right where they lived" because they became Americans with with the same rights any other American has. It's not about self-determination just for it's own sake, self-determination is important to populations who are abused by their rulers.