Quo Vadis, Appeasers?

Patrick

Graduate Poster
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
1,224
Maybe you can move to France? :) A number of liberals threatened to do so if Bush was elected in 2000 - one actually did! Pierre Salinger, who as a young man was press secretary for John Kennedy, moved to Provence and opened a B and B.
 
Patrick said:
Maybe you can move to France? :) A number of liberals threatened to do so if Bush was elected in 2000 - one actually did! Pierre Salinger, who as a young man was press secretary for John Kennedy, moved to Provence and opened a B and B.



And don't let the door hitcha you where the dog shoulda bit ya! :w2:
 
Patrick said:
Maybe you can move to France? :) A number of liberals threatened to do so if Bush was elected in 2000 - one actually did! Pierre Salinger, who as a young man was press secretary for John Kennedy, moved to Provence and opened a B and B.

I see you're following the lead of your president, and trying to "heal" by lying about your opponents, and doing your very best (which is pretty lame, since it's you) to demonize your opponents, and drive them out of the country. No, wait, somehow that's not following the lead of your president. Perhaps you need to reconsider? Well, no, you won't. You really do want to rid the country of anyone who supports freedom, and we all really do know that from your words.

Quite some healer you are.

Then again, it's what you expect from a bowler-hatted thug who runs around rhetorically mugging his betters.
 
Re: Re: Quo Vadis, Appeasers?

circuit slave said:
And don't let the door hitcha you where the dog shoulda bit ya! :w2:

Tell you what, circuit slave, it's the liberals, the ones who have an education, who do science, etc, that keep this country running.

Do you really want us to leave?

I'm serious. Be careful how you answer the question.

DO YOU WANT THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KEEP THIS COUNTRY RUNNING TO LEAVE?

Yes or no.

You're a hostile witness, so just answer it.

Yes or no. Yes or no.

Your answer (I take Patrick as already having said "yes") is being recorded for posterity and taken into account.
 
Re: Re: Re: Quo Vadis, Appeasers?

jj said:
Tell you what, circuit slave, it's the liberals, the ones who have an education, who do science, etc, that keep this country running.

Do you really want us to leave?

I'm serious. Be careful how you answer the question.

DO YOU WANT THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY KEEP THIS COUNTRY RUNNING TO LEAVE?

Yes or no.

You're a hostile witness, so just answer it.

Yes or no. Yes or no.

Your answer (I take Patrick as already having said "yes") is being recorded for posterity and taken into account.


To answer your question, of course not. My point is not "leave if you are liberal or democrate or voted for Kerry" but if your one of those people who talking smack about leaving, then get the hell out.
 
circuit slave said:
To answer your question, of course not. My point is not "leave if you are liberal or democrate or voted for Kerry" but if your one of those people who talking smack about leaving, then get the hell out.
As a liberal, having Bush in office is more of an incentive for me to stay rather than leave. It is my duty to remain here and do what I can to try and protect the rest of the world from the United States.
 
Vorticity said:
As a liberal, having Bush in office is more of an incentive for me to stay rather than leave. It is my duty to remain here and do what I can to try and protect the rest of the world from the United States.


Spoken like a true American. Must give you your props, Vorticity.
 
circuit slave said:
Spoken like a true American. Must give you your props, Vorticity.
I agree with you, except for the sarcasm.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Quo Vadis, Appeasers?

circuit slave said:
To answer your question, of course not. My point is not "leave if you are liberal or democrate or voted for Kerry" but if your one of those people who talking smack about leaving, then get the hell out.

Really?

Have you researched the rise and fall of the third reich, ever?
 
You really do want to rid the country of anyone who supports freedom,

Bush is the one who overturned Saddam and is desperately trying to establish democracy in iraq, and you, an appeaser, dare to lecture me about freedom?? George Orwell is spinning in his grave!
 
Tell you what, circuit slave, it's the liberals, the ones who have an education, who do science, etc, that keep this country running.

Liberals do science? Where the hell do you get that?? Liberals are the lawyers who prey off society like wolves. Liberals are government bureaucrats who live off peoples' taxes. Liberals are smug tenured university professors who discriminate against white males, but wouldn't think of applying "affirmative action" to their own job. Liberals are the scumbag feminazis, jesse jackson types, anti-globalist street rabble, leftwing grant recipients, who when you trace it down are always living at someone else's expense.

If this country got rid of liberals, the stock market would soar, and productivity would go up ten-fold. Like Barry Goldwater famously said, the whole country would be better off if a giant saw could be used to detach the country east of the hudson and just let it float out to sea - a quick look at the state-by-state electoral map shows he was exactly correct.
 
Liberals do science? Where the hell do you get that?? Liberals are the lawyers who prey off society like wolves. Liberals are government bureaucrats who live off peoples' taxes. Liberals are smug tenured university professors who discriminate against white males, but wouldn't think of applying "affirmative action" to their own job. Liberals are the scumbag feminazis, jesse jackson types, anti-globalist street rabble, leftwing grant recipients, who when you trace it down are always living at someone else's expense.

If this country got rid of liberals, the stock market would soar, and productivity would go up ten-fold. Like Barry Goldwater famously said, the whole country would be better off if a giant saw could be used to detach the country east of the hudson and just let it float out to sea - a quick look at the state-by-state electoral map shows he was exactly correct.
Jeeezuz...This post is a real jewel, from the beginning to the end! Quotable material 100%, congratulations!
Are there more people like you in your country? Or maybe you are an special case?
 
hgc said:
I agree with you, except for the sarcasm.



I'm not being sarcastic. Take a stand, regardless what you believe in. Believe or not, I even personally liked Howard Dean. I thought he was totally and completely wrong on everything, but he was just like my president, and had conviction and honestly believed in what he was saying, regardless.
 
circuit slave said:
I'm not being sarcastic. Take a stand, regardless what you believe in. Believe or not, I even personally liked Howard Dean. I thought he was totally and completely wrong on everything, but he was just like my president, and had conviction and honestly believed in what he was saying, regardless.

Did you think he was salvageable? That is, did you think that if you could talk to him, you might be able to get him to see your point of view - or do you think he's nutty but passionate? If so, that's how a lot of people see Bush.
 
Matabiri said:
Did you think he was salvageable? That is, did you think that if you could talk to him, you might be able to get him to see your point of view - or do you think he's nutty but passionate? If so, that's how a lot of people see Bush.

Er….uh….passionate and nutty. :D I mean Howard Dean was anti-war before it got trendy. He spoke his mind plainly and told it like it was. Sure he had no chance in hell to be president but he had that grass roots momentum and had clear points of view. In the end there was no way the democrats were gonna follow the Pied Piper from Vermont off of the cliff, but he stood his ground and did not do the Belgian breakfast.

I also feel bad for him when he was all stoked and “Jones’n” at that rally and the camera was on him. He made that mistake that your not ever supposed to do, look bad on t.v.
 
Patrick said:
Like Barry Goldwater famously said, the whole country would be better off if a giant saw could be used to detach the country east of the hudson and just let it float out to sea - a quick look at the state-by-state electoral map shows he was exactly correct.
Exactly. All the states that went for Kerry, such as Claifornia, Washington, Minnesota, Michagan, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New York, are characterized by laziness, poverty, ignorance, etc., while the Bush states, like Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Idaho, are the backbone of American science, industry, and wealth.
 
Patrick said:
You really do want to rid the country of anyone who supports freedom,

Bush is the one who overturned Saddam and is desperately trying to establish democracy in iraq, and you, an appeaser, dare to lecture me about freedom?? George Orwell is spinning in his grave!

You're a liar, Patrick. You have no cause nor evidence to call me an "appeaser".

It's just more of your immoral, untrue demonization.

Retract that lie completely, Patrick. Retract it now, and don't make any more lies, you immoral bigot.
 
Michael Redman said:
Exactly. All the states that went for Kerry, such as Claifornia, Washington, Minnesota, Michagan, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New York, are characterized by laziness, poverty, ignorance, etc., while the Bush states, like Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Idaho, are the backbone of American science, industry, and wealth.

That's why I'm happy with that "Joke Map" of the USA.

Why don't we just split the country in two, and connect the Kerry-voting parts to Canada?

That's a great idea. Both coasts, most of the ports, and about 85% of the economic power.
 
Michael Redman said:
Exactly. All the states that went for Kerry, such as Claifornia, Washington, Minnesota, Michagan, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New York, are characterized by laziness, poverty, ignorance, etc., while the Bush states, like Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Idaho, are the backbone of American science, industry, and wealth.

A very simplistic, and inaccurate view of the US. Take one of America's biggest industries, aerospace technology and manufacturing. Where is this stuff located? New York? California? Massachussetts? Nope. It's Kansas.

The US is not, and actually never really has been, divided into Rust Belts and Farm Belts and Bible Belts and Brain Belts. Industry, commerce, manufacturing, and universities are scattered around this country. Costs of living vary, and companies exploit that. I can assure you that you'll find plenty of very high tech, sophisticated institutions in Georgia and Virginia, just as many as California and New York.

Let's try to get past stereotypes, shall we? I'll stop assuming all people from Massachussetts are like Frasier Crane, and you stop assuming that all people from Oklahoma are like the Beverly Hillbillies.
 
TragicMonkey said:
A very simplistic, and inaccurate view of the US. Take one of America's biggest industries, aerospace technology and manufacturing. Where is this stuff located? New York? California? Massachussetts? Nope. It's Kansas.

The US is not, and actually never really has been, divided into Rust Belts and Farm Belts and Bible Belts and Brain Belts. Industry, commerce, manufacturing, and universities are scattered around this country. Costs of living vary, and companies exploit that. I can assure you that you'll find plenty of very high tech, sophisticated institutions in Georgia and Virginia, just as many as California and New York.

Let's try to get past stereotypes, shall we? I'll stop assuming all people from Massachussetts are like Frasier Crane, and you stop assuming that all people from Oklahoma are like the Beverly Hillbillies.

Look, the Bush supporters here have made it clear that they don't even want to admit that non-Bush-voting states are part of the country.

I have a simple solution, just annex them over to Canada.

Then we'll see which is the moral part, which is the financially able part, which is the productive part ...
 

Back
Top Bottom