• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does 'rape culture' accurately describe (many) societies?

The only option you should need is to be able to tell the police, and have the police arrest and prosecute your victimizers.

Too bad so many children in the UK don't have that.
Or in USAia, what with the Rapist-in-Chief....
 
i think poem is confusing barely legal with barely illegal. that, of course, is illegal. the legal stuff is legal, although at times only barely.
 
Yep - in the UK it is entirely legal - there is simply no classification of "barely legal" - it is either legal or not.
You commenting on material that is described as barely legal in The Guardian: #3,622:

I'm totally confused: why are you pointing me to porn that is already illegal in the UK as porn that needs to be banned?

This has become a semantic rabbit hole - but the truth is, is that you have described such material as abhorrent.
 
*sees a problem*
"There ought to be a law!"
"There already is a law. It's just not being well enforced."
"Then there oughta be ANOTHER law! And we'll enforce THAT one!"
It is the classic knee-jerk reaction whenever there is a manufactured controversy.
 
You commenting on material that is described as barely legal in The Guardian: #3,622:

I'm totally confused: why are you pointing me to porn that is already illegal in the UK as porn that needs to be banned?

This has become a semantic rabbit hole - but the truth is, is that you have described such material as abhorrent.
 
Nonsense!

You want to reduce unwanted pregnancies? Teach sex education. Teach it in 5th grade, 6th grade 7th grade, etc. Don't stigmatize sex. And make condoms cheap or free, and easy to get. It's a fact that teaching abstinence is a total failure. Doesn't work and leads to more unwanted pregnancies. Not fewer.
Ah, techniques that actually work, as opposed to teaching abstinence.
 
You commenting on material that is described as barely legal in The Guardian: #3,622:

I'm totally confused: why are you pointing me to porn that is already illegal in the UK as porn that needs to be banned?

This has become a semantic rabbit hole - but the truth is, is that you have described such material as abhorrent.
Which despite my ability to inflict human rights crimes on members does not make it the law.
 
Which despite my ability to inflict human rights crimes on members does not make it the law.
It is in this country - you have pressed that point yourself...that we don't need additional legislation. That is effectively saying that the porn taskforce don't know what they are talking about.
 
If you are saying there is some material that might be described as 'barely legal' that the BBFC allows, then sure - of course. Clearly, the BBFC do not find that material as comparable to the Bonnie Blue content.

Again, you appear to be focusing on semantics. You have warned UK posters that watching content (that is on a par with the Bonnie Blue stuff) is illegal.
 
The truth is, of course, that any UK resident can go online and watch such content and they will not be prosecuted. Have said so before.
 
It is in this country - you have pressed that point yourself...that we don't need additional legislation. That is effectively saying that the porn taskforce don't know what they are talking about.
As I have shown you - the legislation already deals with any pornography that has depictions of people under the age of 18, whether they are 18 and older or not.
It is in this country - you have pressed that point yourself...that we don't need additional legislation.
That is effectively saying that the porn taskforce don't know what they are talking about.
That does seem to be the conclusion from the evidence you have presented.
 
The truth is, of course, that any UK resident can go online and watch such content and they will not be prosecuted. Have said so before.
"Barely legal" is legal pornography in the UK so why would anyone expect anyone to be prosecuted for watching such material?
 
"Barely legal" is legal pornography in the UK so why would anyone expect anyone to be prosecuted for watching such material?
This is just another way of saying you don't agree with the description that is used by The Guardian, Barnardos, the porn taskforce, Rachel De Souza etc etc.

The fact is - material that many here are totally comfortable with you have described as abhorrent...viz. the Bonnie Blue classroom content (please CMIIW).
 
Last edited:
If porn were legal everywhere you might have a point.
Nonsense. You demand we deprive people of something they want. Something that is a livelihood for some. We don't do that without evidence.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense. You demand we deprive people of something they want.
Not everyone wants what you want. What you want bleeds over to where it isn't wanted.

Let's put it another way - some want porn so much (want easy access, free content) that they hand wave when presented with the facts about kids seeing it.

And, yes, it's verging on child sex abuse. An adult showing porn to kids in the UK is such abuse - and the porn industry doing virtually the same by wallpapering the net is guilty too.

I'm with the FTC - they are morally bankrupt...for many reasons.
Something that is a livelihood for some. We don't do that without evidence.
Like I said, some countries ban it.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom