catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
This is, of course, a lie.Oh, and your ◊◊◊◊◊◊ up immigration situation is making it harder to provide all the social services you claim you want anyways.
This is, of course, a lie.Oh, and your ◊◊◊◊◊◊ up immigration situation is making it harder to provide all the social services you claim you want anyways.
Or in USAia, what with the Rapist-in-Chief....The only option you should need is to be able to tell the police, and have the police arrest and prosecute your victimizers.
Too bad so many children in the UK don't have that.
You commenting on material that is described as barely legal in The Guardian: #3,622:Yep - in the UK it is entirely legal - there is simply no classification of "barely legal" - it is either legal or not.
It is the classic knee-jerk reaction whenever there is a manufactured controversy.*sees a problem*
"There ought to be a law!"
"There already is a law. It's just not being well enforced."
"Then there oughta be ANOTHER law! And we'll enforce THAT one!"
Civil court that case....but you have a point.Or in USAia, what with the Rapist-in-Chief....
You could look at the actual law? Or would that be too much trouble....Citation?
You commenting on material that is described as barely legal in The Guardian: #3,622:
I'm totally confused: why are you pointing me to porn that is already illegal in the UK as porn that needs to be banned?
This has become a semantic rabbit hole - but the truth is, is that you have described such material as abhorrent.
Yep - in the UK it is entirely legal - there is simply no classification of "barely legal" - it is either legal or not.Barely legal IS STILL LEGAL!. The law drew a line and they didn't cross it. Doh!


Ah, techniques that actually work, as opposed to teaching abstinence.Nonsense!
You want to reduce unwanted pregnancies? Teach sex education. Teach it in 5th grade, 6th grade 7th grade, etc. Don't stigmatize sex. And make condoms cheap or free, and easy to get. It's a fact that teaching abstinence is a total failure. Doesn't work and leads to more unwanted pregnancies. Not fewer.
Which despite my ability to inflict human rights crimes on members does not make it the law.You commenting on material that is described as barely legal in The Guardian: #3,622:
I'm totally confused: why are you pointing me to porn that is already illegal in the UK as porn that needs to be banned?
This has become a semantic rabbit hole - but the truth is, is that you have described such material as abhorrent.
It is in this country - you have pressed that point yourself...that we don't need additional legislation. That is effectively saying that the porn taskforce don't know what they are talking about.Which despite my ability to inflict human rights crimes on members does not make it the law.
If you are saying there is some material that might be described as 'barely legal' that the BBFC allows, then sure - of course. Clearly, the BBFC do not find that material as comparable to the Bonnie Blue content.Yep - in the UK it is entirely legal - there is simply no classification of "barely legal" - it is either legal or not.Barely legal IS STILL LEGAL!. The law drew a line and they didn't cross it. Doh!
ETA:
Just did a quick check for DVDs available in the UK, asked DuckDuckGo search for "UK sellers of pornographic DVDs", the first choice was this one:
On the page that came up, there was a search option, I type "barley" into the search option, this was the result - pixelization added by me:
Those are legally available in the UK with a BBFC classification...
As I have shown you - the legislation already deals with any pornography that has depictions of people under the age of 18, whether they are 18 and older or not.It is in this country - you have pressed that point yourself...that we don't need additional legislation. That is effectively saying that the porn taskforce don't know what they are talking about.
That does seem to be the conclusion from the evidence you have presented.It is in this country - you have pressed that point yourself...that we don't need additional legislation.
That is effectively saying that the porn taskforce don't know what they are talking about.
"Barely legal" is legal pornography in the UK so why would anyone expect anyone to be prosecuted for watching such material?The truth is, of course, that any UK resident can go online and watch such content and they will not be prosecuted. Have said so before.
This is just another way of saying you don't agree with the description that is used by The Guardian, Barnardos, the porn taskforce, Rachel De Souza etc etc."Barely legal" is legal pornography in the UK so why would anyone expect anyone to be prosecuted for watching such material?
No, that is your conclusion.That does seem to be the conclusion from the evidence you have presented.
Nonsense. You demand we deprive people of something they want. Something that is a livelihood for some. We don't do that without evidence.If porn were legal everywhere you might have a point.
Not everyone wants what you want. What you want bleeds over to where it isn't wanted.Nonsense. You demand we deprive people of something they want.
Like I said, some countries ban it.Something that is a livelihood for some. We don't do that without evidence.
Would it be trouble for you to back up with substantive evidence when you make a claim?You could look at the actual law? Or would that be too much trouble....