• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A scientific fact/tidbit you recently learned that you thought was interesting

The speed of the Earth's rotation is (very) gradually slowing. A day in the age of dinosaurs was 23 hours long.
 
I found this passage from the book I'm reading The Secret of our Success by Joseph Henrick, to be particularly interesting, both for the history about the Polar Inuit, and the relationship to his general thesis:

Surrounded by a sea of ice above the seventry-fifth parallel, the Polar Inuit live in an isolated region of northwestern Greenland, at the farthest reaches of the Inuit's massive expansion across the Arctic. They are the northernmost human population that has ever existed. Sometime in the 1820s an epidemic hit this population of hunters and selectively killed off many of its oldest and most knowledgeable members. With the sudden disappearance of the know-how carried by these individuals, the group collectively lost its ability to make some of its most crucial and complex tolls, including listens, bows and arrows, the heat-trapping long entry ways for snow houses, and most important, kayaks. With the loss of kayaks, the Polar Inuit became effectively marooned, unable to maintain contact with other Inuit populations from which they could relearn this lost know-how. As noted by the Arctic explorers Elisha Kane and Isaac Hayes, who encountered the Polar Inuit while searching for Sir John Franklin, these technological losses had a dramatic impact, leaving the group unable to hunt caribou (no bows) or harvest the plentiful Arctic char from local streams (no listens).

The population declined until 1862, when another group of Inuit from around Baffin Island ran across them while traveling along the Greenland coast. The subsequent cultural reconnection led the Polar Inuit to rapidly reacquire what they had lost, copying everything including the style of Baffin Island kayaks. Decades later, with their population again increasing, and with ongoing contact with other Inuit in the rest of Greenland, the style of Polar Inuit kayaks gradually drifted back from the large beamy kayaks learned from the baffin Islanders to the small sleek kayaks fo western Greenland.

Though crucial to survival in the Arctic, the lost technologies were not things that the Polar Inuit could easily recreate. Even having seen these technologies in operation as children and with their population creating, neither the older generation nor an entirely new generation responded to Mother Necessity by devising kayaks, listens, compound bows, or long tunnel entrances. These sophisticated technologies had evolved culturally over generations, and this process of cumulative cultural evolution has imbued these technologies with nuances that implicitly depended on subtle, or even counterintuitive, engineering principles. And, lest there be any doubt that they really needed these lost technologies it bears emphasis that they immediately readopted all the missing know-how once they had been reconnected to the broader Inuit collective brain - which began when the Baffin Islanders happened by.

This simple historical case gives us a glimpse into one of the secrets to our success - and our Achilles heel. Once individuals evolve to learn from one another with sufficient accuracy (fidelity), social groups of individuals develop what might be called collective brains. The power of these collective brains to develop increasingly effective tools and technologies, as well as other forms of nonmaterial culture (e.g. know-how) depends in part on the size of the group of individuals and their social interconnectedness. It's our collective brains operating over generations, and not the innate inventive power or creative abilities of individual brains, that explain our species fancy technologies and massive ecological success. Even individuals facing a life-and-death situation with weeks or months to prepare weren't nearly smart enough to figure out how to make even the basic tools for survival, as we learned from Burke and Wills, Franklin's men, and the Narvaez expedition. Our collective brains arise from a number of synergies created by the sharing of information among individuals.

(I'm in a bit of a rush, the above is transcribed but I don't have time to go through and note all my typing errors, so sorry for that...)
 
The speed of the Earth's rotation is (very) gradually slowing. A day in the age of dinosaurs was 23 hours long.

This is true. Related to that is that the Moon was closer to the Earth. The tides were bigger than now. When life first started on Earth tides were huge as the moon was far closer to the Earth. I could look up the figures, but I am too lazy.
 
This is true. Related to that is that the Moon was closer to the Earth. The tides were bigger than now. When life first started on Earth tides were huge as the moon was far closer to the Earth. I could look up the figures, but I am too lazy.

And related to that, the period of time during which total eclipses occur as they do now - with the moon exactly covering the sun, allowing the spectacular display of the corona and prominences - is a pretty small percentage of the earth's history (like you, I'm too lazy to look up the figures). It's sheer luck that we happened to evolve during the small window during which we can get treated to those displays.
 
And related to that, the period of time during which total eclipses occur as they do now - with the moon exactly covering the sun, allowing the spectacular display of the corona and prominences - is a pretty small percentage of the earth's history (like you, I'm too lazy to look up the figures). It's sheer luck that we happened to evolve during the small window during which we can get treated to those displays.

If an early dinosaur viewed a total eclipse then the sun would be blocked out completely and a larger land area would be covered by the eclipse. Against that the area would be moving faster than present.

On the other hand just around the edges of the total eclipse, the corona would be visable.
 
The moon formed at about half its current distance, which would make its gravitational effects four times as strong and its orbital period half as long. The number of days in a year was in the 460s because they were roughly 19 hours long.

The moon's silhouette in the sky had twice the diameter and four times the apparent surface area of the its appearance, so solar eclipses covered most of the corona but not all, so the "ring of fire" effect existed but would have been much weaker/dimmer. The moon's light & dark patches wouldn't have been the same at first for two reasons. The moon was still "geologically" active at first and those colors would only lock in after that period ended, and it was not tidally locked at first so whatever colored areas it did have would have been constantly spinning in & out of view.
 
I found this passage from the book I'm reading The Secret of our Success by Joseph Henrick, to be particularly interesting, both for the history about the Polar Inuit, and the relationship to his general thesis:



(I'm in a bit of a rush, the above is transcribed but I don't have time to go through and note all my typing errors, so sorry for that...)

That was very interesting thanks. I was puzzled by "listens" and googling I guess it's autocorrupt for "leister" or fishing spear.
 
I found this passage from the book I'm reading The Secret of our Success by Joseph Henrick, to be particularly interesting, both for the history about the Polar Inuit, and the relationship to his general thesis:



(I'm in a bit of a rush, the above is transcribed but I don't have time to go through and note all my typing errors, so sorry for that...)

Very interesting indeed, and as a kind of side note, if you ever get the opportunity to read Elisha Kent Kane's book Arctic Explorations, it is surprisingly fun to read, especially the second volume, and as a bonus, if you get the original or a good recopy of it, the illustrating engravings are wonderful. Kane conducted one of several trips to the arctic that were funded by Sir John Franklin's wife to try to find him. They did not succeed, but had quite an adventure in the process.
 
Not sure if it counts as science, but I thought "Benford's Law" was pretty cool.

In short, it an explanation of different types of what we often call randomness. If you have a bunch of so-called "random" data, like a large chart of the distances between stars, or the circumferences of trees in a certain country, people assume that the data is mostly random in such a way that the digits (0-9) are randomly distributed.

There are a couple of different ways you can show that they're not. One of which, of course, is to just look at the data and see that it is not so. More interesting is to try and see why by understanding Benford's Law.

Once you understand it well enough, when you hear about a set of data, you can determine whether or not Benford's Law will apply.
 
Very interesting indeed, and as a kind of side note, if you ever get the opportunity to read Elisha Kent Kane's book Arctic Explorations, it is surprisingly fun to read, especially the second volume, and as a bonus, if you get the original or a good recopy of it, the illustrating engravings are wonderful. Kane conducted one of several trips to the arctic that were funded by Sir John Franklin's wife to try to find him. They did not succeed, but had quite an adventure in the process.

Thanks! I just checked and Project Gutenberg has two titles by that author:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/44502
Adrift In The Arctic Ice Pack and The Far North: Explorations in the Arctic Regions.

Any chance it's one of those but just under a different title? Anyway, I'm going to check them out. :)
 
Thanks! I just checked and Project Gutenberg has two titles by that author:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/44502
Adrift In The Arctic Ice Pack and The Far North: Explorations in the Arctic Regions.

Any chance it's one of those but just under a different title? Anyway, I'm going to check them out. :)

Chances are pretty good, as Kane died almost immediately following the publication of Arctic Explorations.

Unfortunately I now only have the second volumw. I once found a complete pair and gave them to my mom, and found some years later that it had been discarded or passed on by a housekeeper cleaning up.

Here's a link to volume 2, including a downloadable PDF, which appears to have at least some of the illustrations, though I think it might lack the very romantic frontispiece.

https://openlibrary.org/works/OL162...?edition=key:/books/OL23278715M#editions-list

e.t.a. I looked at your link and it looks a little different. I think it may be a later revision or condensation of the original. The link I put above is the book I actually have.
 
Last edited:
Sadly your link seems to be blocked by the Chinese firewall, but the good news is that on reading the preface of The Far North: Explorations in the Arctic Regions, it looks like it's the book you describe, so I'll be reading this one. :D
 
It's sheer luck that we happened to evolve during the small window during which we can get treated to those displays.
Understatement of the century. It's sheer luck beyond all belief that we exist, or even more primitive forms of life did before us. Like it makes winning the lotto look easy. When you learn about all the events that led up to us.......not just Earth being in the "Goldilocks Zone," but the numerous stages our planet has gone through which ultimately propelled life to new heights (including mass extinctions) on and on it goes.
 

Back
Top Bottom