• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Science 2.0 Episode By Episode

Status
Not open for further replies.
hank hill said:
That's trash compared to Science 2.0!
Click to expand...


What, the orgasming anal tattoo video? Dude, that’s comedy gold, especially compared to the crap on Science 2.0.

Why do you keep acting like that meandering mumblecore refuse is interesting or worth watching? Seriously. Even if it is your content you have to realize by now that it’s unwatchable tripe.
 
halleyscomet said:
...Now, imagine the idiot is just wise enough to not get sucked into the crazy, but they have another critical flaw. They're not funny, but they're convinced they are. If they tried stand-up they'd keep muttering incoherently until a bouncer threw them off the stage or the place emptied out. They're so convinced they're funny however that they think than can "Colbert Report" their way into fame by play-acting a particularity delusional conspiracy theorist....
Click to expand...

Jack by the hedge said:
In the sense of not getting it, realising there's nothing to get, thinking about other people not getting it and perhaps getting angry, then thinking other people getting angry is funny, well maybe...
Click to expand...





So Science 2.0 is somewhere between The Ron Tomkins Show* and Andy Kaufman?




*with apologies to Ron. In my defense, it WAS right there ...

 
Elagabalus said:
So Science 2.0 is somewhere between The Ron Tomkins Show* and Andy Kaufman?









*with apologies to Ron. In my defense, it WAS right there ...
Click to expand...



I think that comparison is unduly complimentary to Science 2.0 and its marketing team.
 
hank hill said:
No, HE would say "nel cicreg dont need any tention he has nough allready" because that's how he talks. I don't talk like that because I'm not him!
Click to expand...

Oh damm, ur rite!! Him HAVS a comicolly iliiterate poSTIng stiyel so obvuloosely DAT means he coodn't be you. I SO stUPId.
 
RoboTimbo said:
Perhaps you should give it attention in the comments on the videos themselves where other like "minded" people also post?

On this forum, people udderstand that you're the YouTuber with the craptastic videos that nobody wants to watch. You know you're you, we know you're you, everyone who visits this thread will know it's you. You're simply milking this thread for views on your videos.

Now tell me about this competition you have with Sean Cowes. I've herd that could be interesting.
Click to expand...

ISWYDT

 
halleyscomet said:
My Reddit account has gotten a random message from /u/colonelcommand. Note that all I’ve said about this whole debacle on Reddit was posting a link to the Science 2.0 “about” video with an insulting title.

[qimg]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190427/4421ae88e2d21c0027be67d8e7c54dcd.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Aw, man, they know who you are now. Might gang up on you.

colonelcommand: you don't want to know about these things, halleyscomet.

*switches accounts*

thescience20: YAS wut him sAYEd

*switches accounts*

NicolasSequiera: I am totes not with these losers and posers

*switches accounts*

pudpuller6969; aw, ****, that's my pornhub...wait a sec, guys...
 
hank hill said:
I already made a thread on Science 2.0, but it was derailed. THIS thread will be more stringent, with an episode-by-episode overview for anyone who wants to follow the satirical webseries Science 2.0. Anybody who does not like Science 2.0 or finds him boring can go to the other thread. THIS thread is strictly for discussion of Science 2.0 We'll start with Episode 1. What are your thoughts? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmKNKZN9l9w&t=567s
Click to expand...


One of a couple of things. You are either the most boring person in the world, or, you are mentally ill.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom