catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
510$ now. Boy, that thing just keeps on ticking, doesn't it ?
It's probably worth adding that if the cost of electricity rose, then the cost of mining wouldn't rise as much as it otherwise would if the mining difficulty was constant. However, as the unprofitable miners bail, the mining difficulty reduces.
This is no different to any system whose equilibrium has been disturbed.
Well, it's official. My decision to consult a crystal ball instead of a magic 8-ball has resulted in a failed prophecy.If you really want me to make a guess that you can hang me by then I might as well indulge you.A "prediction" that has no set time limit isn't much of a prediction: at no point can you say "here, you were wrong", because the person making the prediction can claim that it's not quite time yet.
Bitcoin prices will probably follow a similar path to what they did during the Cyprus crisis. After the current kerfuffle settles down, the price will probability hover around the $800 mark for a few weeks before taking off again. It is not unreasonable to suppose that prices would hit the $2000 mark sometime before June next year. Of course, the volatility being what it is, it's anybody's guess what the actual price will be in June.
You can regard this prophecy to be a failure if the price doesn't exceed $1200 some time during the next 6 months, there is no recovery phase, the price hits the $1200 mark but then falls back and for most of the 6 months it doesn't exceed $1000 or if the price has dropped below $500 in June.
You had to wait a fortnight for the price of bitcoin to dip below $600 so your "guess" doesn't count.
At least I didn't wait until after the price dipped then claimed that I knew it would happen all along.A fortnight is still better than 6 months![]()
Don't worry, I didn't mention you but I had no doubt that you would also refuse to admit that you failed.
Wait, I did mention you. This thread is way too quiet, now. I tend to forget what I write, it seems.
Scratch that. Thanks for confirming what I said.
LOL!
You have confirmed that you have sour grapes about my guess from the beginning.
So-called 51 percenters, for instance, have the ability to spend the same coins twice, reject competing miners' transactions, or extort higher fees from people with large holdings. Even worse, a malicious player with a majority holding could wage a denial-of-service attack against the entire Bitcoin network.